Note: This is US only.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Didn’t know they tried this before. What was the issue the first time?

    Quality issues?

    • southsamurai
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Seagate has a pretty bad rep for failures. Depending on who you ask, they’re anywhere from trash to the least reliable major brand.

      I sit somewhere in the middle of that tbh. Closer to the trash side since every time I’ve had a Seagate drive in anything, it failed way sooner than what they claim they should, and they tend to fail hard and fast. Not much warning, so if you use them, you damn well better not lag in your backup routine, or you’ll lose data.

      For the prices they charge, they should at least be okay compared to other brands.

      So, any refurbs they sell have already failed once, or had enough trouble to be sent back. If they couldn’t get it right so often as to be able to sell refurbs in large numbers, I’m pretty damn dubious they actually fixed anything well enough it won’t happen again. And I tink that’s what the other comment meant.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Agreed regarding Seagate’s brand perception for consumer HDDs.

        I would also not risk buying these refurbs, unless it was literally for something that I didn’t care about.

    • minibyte
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think they’re saying Seagate drives are unreliable out of the box.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The fact that a 22TB drive has already been refurbished does not fill me with hope regarding its longevity

      (For context, these drives in particular can’t be older than literally a year)

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think you underestimate the number of drives they produce…

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think you’ve missed my point:

          Seagate have a pretty bad reputation anyway, and these are refurbished disks that couldn’t even last a year. I don’t expect they’ll last much longer a second time.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            On the other hand, I bought a few refurbished HGST’s on Amazon and found they were brand new like many had claimed.

            That is many “refurbished” drives are drives that a company bought by mistake and returned without ever unpacking them. They can’t be sold as new but they are.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            What I’m saying is that if you make enough of a product, from day one there will be defective units and that will happen with each and every manufacturer out there.

            • 9point6@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              For sure, but emphasising the Seagate reputation part:

              Expecting the new disks to be good is a foolish thing to do,

              Expecting the refurbished ones to somehow exceed that expectation is even more foolish

              • Kecessa
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t think anyone is expecting a refurbished disk to last longer and I don’t know why you’re trying to argue based on that…

                  • Kecessa
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I expect the failure rate to be higher than on a brand new product, you’re just making the assumption that because it failed once (if it actually did, could simply be a disk that was returned after purchase) it will fail again as quickly, which is a pretty bad assessment.