• Rooskie91@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think people realize how far the NRA has gone to block ANY legislation that will reduce gun sales. We have bad gun laws not because of the lack of effort from government, but specifically how much effort the NRA has put in to stop it.

        They went bankrupt funding progun policy.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is one of my favorite stories.

          The ATF completely screwed up the raid on the Branch Davidian Church in Waco back in 1993. It was indenfesnable and a lot of people started saying that the Agency should be abolished and its responsibilities moved to the FBI.

          “Small government” GOPs blocked any mention of the idea, because they were worried about having the FBI looking into gun crimes.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do you have a source for that? That would be a very interesting read.

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Talk to anyone who was old enough to vote for Clinton.

              It wasn’t a big dramatic floor fight in Congress. People started talking about doing away with the ATF, and the idea seemed to be gaining momentum, and then it just…vanished.

        • vaultdweller013
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Also they backed banning open carry here in California because the scarry Black Panthers. Bunch of racists cowards, also wallow in piss Ronald Reagan ya fucking profligate.

  • Varyk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Okay, so almost two mass shootings per day is the line at which a US official is willing to speak out against gun violence.

    Good to know.

    I would have said one mass shooting a week is really pushing it, but that’s why they’re the surgeon general.

    Line in the sand: roughly two mass shootings everyday.

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I read a headline yesterday that a toddler has been injured by firearms every day for the last two years in the US. But abortion is the problem. As an 80s kid, no disrespect, but guns are gay.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Only two? We passed 2 a few years back. I’ve seen 8 but if the average isn’t 4 I’ll be surprised.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yup, the average for US mass shootings, as in multiple victims of gun violence from a single shooting, in 2024 up to June is 1.5 per day, or about one mass shooting in the US every 16 hours.

        You might be thinking of regular shootings, where only one person is injured, which is way more common and includes suicides and accidents.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Waiting for the right to panic about stats they have been trying to hide for 30 years. Or they will force a recall vote to remove the Surgeon General.

  • avattar@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m here thinking: “but gunshots are not a disease? Wait, gunshots ARE treated at hospitals, and probably take a lot more resources to treat than, say, a fever. So it does fall within his purview in my uninformed opinion.”

    And then I thought “But why are people shooting each other? Maybe he should have declared a mental health crisis?”

    So to conclude, I think it would be more productive to treat the mental health issue, and gun crimes should reduce. Of course, reducing the number and availability of guns would help too, but seems a harder problem to tackle.

    • Bilbo_Haggins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is actually the main policy stance of the Liberal Gun Club. That we’re spending all this time regulating guns and ignoring/underaddressing the root causes like mental health issues, domestic violence, toxic masculinity, income inequality, poverty, etc.

      Not to say that guns shouldn’t be regulated to some extent, but with the way mental health is in America I’m pretty sure we’d just see a spike in knife and baseball bat crime and suicide by hanging if we somehow magically got rid of guns.

      https://theliberalgunclub.com/about-us/root-cause-mitigation-2/

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        there’s mentally ill people in every country but only in america do they have easy access to firearms with hardly any red tape.

          • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Canada says “High”. we don’t have a functional mental health solution and it’s only gotten worse. And while we do have gun crime, it’s nowhere near the same as our southern neighbour because of our gun restrictions and we don’t Fetishize gun culture.

            Mental health IS part of the problem. But the insane culture around owning firearms in the US directly leads to the prevalence of gun crime.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    Didnt we already go down this path, and it was found that it was already covered by multiple other agencies, and the Surgeon General had no jurisdiction?

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Congress effectively barred the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from funding gun violence research. It wasn’t until 2019 that Congress ended the two-decade freeze with $25 million in annual funding.

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Surgeon General doesn’t have jurisdiction to declare a public health crisis? Seems like exactly their jurisdiction. It’s not like they’re trying to pass or enforce any laws. Plus those other agencies are clearly derelict of duty, so I’m all for the any functional agencies doing whatever they can to force positive change on this troglodytic tire fire of a nation.

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          They didn’t say there’s a public health crisis “on crimes,” they said there’s a public health crisis of gun violence, which is obviously very accurate. I’m not sure if you’re aware, but when it comes to public health, guns can actually only have a negative impact. That’s how they’re designed.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            So is inflation an epidemic too? How about climate change? It all affects health! We should let the SG pass any law he wants!

            • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Again, they didn’t pass a law, they’re not a legislative body.

              But you bring up a good point, climate change is a public health crisis. I’d actually be worried if the Surgeon General wasn’t worried about it. Inflation’s just a symptom of capitalism though, you gotta get to the root of the problem if you want real change.

            • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              So is inflation an epidemic too?

              Yes… Not the point you’re trying to make I guess.

              We should let the SG pass any law he wants!

              SG isn’t passing any laws. They are making a statement.