• Revonult@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For his voters, his lies and fabrications are the truth. They don’t listen to fact checking because they are conditioned to see it as fake and a goverment ploy to fool them.

    • ricecake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      True. But they were going to have the same criticism of Biden regardless.

      It’s part of the reason I didn’t even watch. Looking over the polling, the debate didn’t really change anyone’s opinions on anything to any significant degree.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think it has been long enough to have gathered enough data on that. Just watching it myself I could clearly see a low information voter seeing Trump as a more fit choice as Biden struggled to even form sentences :(

        • ricecake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They did a lot of the pre-selection of people beforehand. The headline most places are running with is “flash poll says trump won”, but if you actually read the conclusions, it’s that “flash poll says trump won, more Republicans watched the debate by about a ten percent margin, and no one changed their opinions about fitness for office or who they’re voting for”.

      • CancerMancer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What the polling likely isn’t capturing is how many people will ultimately choose not to vote out of despair, and that was the real threat the whole time.

        • ricecake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh, definitely. Not just possible, they weren’t even looking for that. They were entirely looking for what the debate did to preferences and opinions directly about the candidates.

          I mostly brought it out as an example of the headline not capturing the whole message of how it impacted voters. Or didn’t impact, rather.