• Bookmeat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Sure, but then there won’t be any conservative judges left to let him off the hook for it.

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Unironically yes, and he could easily justify it as ‘official business’ as dealing with traitors too.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    For some reason I imagine shirtless ripped Biden walkinging into the supreme court champer ripping a cig and saying “nothing personal, this is just official presidential business.” Slipping on some brass knucks and charging into a fray of bodies.

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It sure would be a shame if certain justices scuba vacations happened to be hit with drone strikes

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think technically he could order someone with the legal authority to use lethal force to do that. So probably the NSA or CIA.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    He doesn’t even need to do it personally since no one can question his ability to pardon whoever does it. So he could order it or just ask “Won’t someone rid me of these troublesome justices?”

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      This type of cringe shit is beat only by QAnons posting about “the Kraken.” Is “Dark Brandon” in the room right now?

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s a ridiculous self-depreciating meme. It’s funny because it contrasts with Biden being old and frail.

        QAnons actually believe their shit.

        • Atin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          They believe it because it is exactly what they would do given the opportunity.

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          6 months ago

          You think many Dems don’t treat it seriously?

          • Alteon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            You seriously think that there liberals that think “Dark Brandon” is real? Lol. Get out of here man…

            • Deceptichum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              6 months ago

              Real? No I do not think they believe there is an alternative copy of Biden who actually does something.

              What I believe is they think Biden is owning Trump and a huge bad arse.

      • Alteon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Simmer down there Karen. It’s supposed to be funny. It’s not supposed to be taken seriously.

  • fsxylo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    They sent it back to a lower court so the actual details can be delayed and decided after the election.

    So no, Biden can’t. If trump wins he most certainly can.

    Both sides

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Okay so in that case what Biden could do is go ahead and execute all of his political opponents and then if the lower court returns that the ruling of the supreme Court is unconstitutional than the new supreme Court can decide whether or not to uphold that.

    • dmMeYourNudes@lemmynsfw.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      To decide if the list of trumps illegal actions are considered official like social media posts. Now that the rule is set to protect anything official Biden only has to put it on white house stationary to make any action legal.

      • fsxylo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which consequentially defines what the president can do. SCOTUS did NOT give Biden permission to execute them.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Not possible in the way you think. First of all he wasn’t being sued over student loan forgiveness the government was, generally speaking you can’t sue the president.

      Second the supreme court ruling is about criminal liability, that is/was a civil case.

      And lastly of the 400 billion in student loan debt that order would have forgiven the Biden administration has managed to claw back something like 170 billion in loan forgiveness through other means.

      • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Other means” being what is directly inline with the unitary executive theory that conservatives have been pushing on you for decades.

        JUST WAVE THE WAND is why people hate Obama.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Biden should at least go full Office Space and move all of their desks to the basement of the Supreme Court building. Maybe pass an executive order where the justices all have to ride to work together on a special Supreme Court short bus. I’m fine if he keeps it petty but I just hope he does something to show how dumb of a ruling it is (but probably won’t).

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    This isn’t really a shower thought. Its been shared and posted and thought by everyone everywhere ad nauseum in a fucking record short timeframe.

    • Griffon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      No one does. Roberts conveniently left out how he would determine what acts are “official” from his opinion.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Article II Section 3 says the president shall take care to execute the laws faithfully. I do not see how a president could issue an official illegal order.

        • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 months ago

          It doesn’t matter. He cannot be found criminally liable now. The law does not apply to him. Fuck SCOTUS

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    He could have expanded the courts on day one of office.

    All of this could have been avoided.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Can we agree that he can definitely use his mouth to say “I endorse doing something”?

      • kakes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Tbf people say this about a lot of things the Republicans do.