• KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean, to play devil’s advocate, it’s their job. He’s their client, they’re supposed to work in their client’s best interest, and as long as they’re not breaking any laws to do it, they’re doing what they’re being paid to do.

    I think it more comes down to the judge needing to put a stop to the bad-faith arguments; if the judge is accepting them, why wouldn’t they keep making them?

    • xmunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yea, okay, we can hold off on our coronal mass injection cannon for now - but if those fucks break any laws trying to intimidate jurors or bribing officials… well, I’ll keep the cannon spun up in my garage.

      I, specifically, want Trump to gain no special benefits or privileges based on him being Trump or wealthy - he’s gotten far too many gifts already.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        no special benefits or privileges based on him being […] wealthy

        That’s unfortunately simply not the world we live in.

        • xmunk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So you’re saying I should wind up the cannon? Can’t a mad scientist just launch a few people into the sun without all this back and forth?! /s

          Yea, I know. It fucking sucks.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, this is it. It’s the defense’s job to zealously defend to the extent of the law, the burden is necessarily on the state to prove things and carry out justice.

      Which is why when your supreme court are corrupt fascist bastards and fuck all that up, there’s not a lot of options left. It would have been great to elect someone from a competent or at least not-evil party to avoid this particular situation but “we” didn’t.