• Zerlyna
    link
    fedilink
    English
    941 month ago

    Imagine how many malnourished families that would feed.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 month ago

      You could set up a hundred malnourished families with retirement for that amount.

        • Pennomi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Sure, I guess I was thinking “quite comfortable and sustainable.” Let’s say a million dollars at a 4% fixed interest rate, allowing $40k per year to live off of. That’s quite reasonable in some areas of the country.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            121 month ago

            That feeling when 40k per year is 5 times what you get.

            But in all seriousness I think that is a solid model.

  • @jballsOP
    link
    English
    691 month ago

    He’s planning on giving $180,000,000 before the election. That’s a lot of free speech.

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      531 month ago

      Divide that by 180 and it’s still more free speech than most people will ever see in a lifetime.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’d think he’d be worried about trump removing ev subsidies, as he said he would multiple times, but Tesla stock seems so untied to reality that even if sales plunged the stock might increase as more of his braindead supporters would buy it to own the libs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      I don’t, in musk’s mind it’s probably buying a favor so Tesla is excluded from subsidies removal. They’d find another way to get Musk more federal funds by saying their only a tech company and working on AI or some shit like that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      (only commenting because it changes the meaning of your point)

      I think you typoed “untied” and in your defense, my phone just autocorrected that to “United”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 month ago

    While campaign finance laws are dogshit these days, isn’t there some kind of upper limit on how much one can donate to a campaign?

    • DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      221 month ago

      That’s why he’s not donating to the campaign. He’s donating to a Maga PAC.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      There are limits to what an individual can donate to a campaign and a PAC. There are no limits to donating to a Super PAC.

      https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/taking-receipts-pac/contribution-limits-nonconnected-pacs/
      https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/taking-receipts-pac/contributions-to-super-pacs-and-hybrid-pacs/

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_action_committee#Super_PACs

      Super PACs are unlike traditional PACs in that they may raise unlimited amounts from individuals, corporations, unions, and other groups to spend on, for example, ads overtly advocating for or against political candidates. However, they are not allowed to either coordinate with or contribute directly to candidate campaigns or political parties.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        One thing to note is pac money is less efficient than campaign money. Campaigns get the lowest rate for advertisements while pacs pay market rate. Super pacs technically can’t coordinate with campaigns so there isn’t a unified message, however the FEC is pretty toothless so any coordination would likely have to be very blatant for action to be taken. Their advertisements can also be overly biased by their ultra wealthy donors, ie something that musk cares about a lot may not have significant sway on the public which can cause said ad to be wasted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      The answer is similar to the answer of, “Do large corporations pay taxes?”

      Technically, large corporations pay taxes and there’s limits to how much an individual donates to a political campaign.

      But, if the individual uses financial constructs such as SPACS and C-Corporations, they can effectively donate as much as they wish, and even do so covertly.

      It’s like most anything else: The rules are constructed for and enforced inversely proportional to fiscal class.

      Small groups can make a substantial difference by using these tools for “good”. A fantastic example of an idea that scaled beautifully is Proton, a C-corp, soon to be majority owned by a trust with zero liabilities, soon forever subordinate to the principle of privacy in digital services.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That’s a small price for getting Trumpists to boost Tesla stock price and become a couple billion richer.

  • smnwcj
    link
    fedilink
    01 month ago

    He knows Trump will win, it’s a safe bet to win some favor.