Meanwhile, 44 percent backed the American tradition of competing branches of government as a model, if sometimes “frustrating,” system.

Why would people want to live under an authoritarian’s thumb? It’s rooted, experts say, in a psychological need for security—real or perceived—and a desire for conformity, a goal that becomes even more acute as the country undergoes dramatic demographic and social changes. People also like to obey a strong leader who will protect the group—especially if it is the “right” group whose interests will be protected. Recall the Trump supporter who, during the 2019 government shutdown, complained, “He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.”

  • Album@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The people who dont want to be told how they live desperately want someone to tell them how to live.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They want their opinion mirrored back at them by someone in power so they don’t have to take responsibility for their own opinions.

      A close friend of mine is a woman of color and her bosses want the same things from her. They wants to hear their opinion come out of someone with her skin tone so they feel justified and not responsible at the same time. I imagine these are similar phenomenon.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They don’t want to be told how to live while simultaneously having someone force others to live like them.

    • DBT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      To have others be told how to live, which is how they prefer to live already.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly.

        They support him because they believe he is like them, so they won’t need to change anything. It’s everyone else that will be forced to be like them that they want…

        I hope I’m not spreading misinformation, but I believe one of the victims of the assassination attempt had a flag on his Facebook page that was a play off of “don’t tread on me” and in it’s place was a tank with “tread on all of them.”

        I fucking hate these people so much

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The people who don’t want to be told how to live want other people to be told how to live thinking they’ll be left alone.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also fun fact:

      Every tabletop scenario he ran (think like a UN version of Risk) in which the Authoritarians had control, they wiped out everyone with nuclear war including themselves.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think we’ll go out that way, but I do 100% believe our greed will be our “great filter” that we do not pass. :(

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 months ago

          with dwindling resources on a warming planet, I think the likelyhood of a significant nuclear exchange is dramatically increased - perhaps even inevitable.

          agree with the great filter. it makes me think that humans, having acted as a great filter for our hominid family tree, are about to reap what we have been sowing for the last 200k+ years.

          or this could be a one of many catalysts for speciation. I sometimes feel that some people are already a different species. not better, not worse (not willing to engage in subjective morality) - just different, with different goals, problems and problem solving tools.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        If I remember correctly, even after giving the authoritarians a do-over, they still fucked it up.

        Meanwhile, the people in the other group who scored low on authoritarianism like solved the climate crisis and world hunger.

        Some people are legitimately bad at politics and stuff, and it’s not the people the authoritarians are mad about.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yep lol. Every chance they got they blew themselves and everyone else up. It was quite the crazy read on a flight from Boston to Chicago lol.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    32% of americans are chickenshit responsibility abrogators that want everything they do to be dictated to them. Religion has been a major primer for that mindset

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      At some level, people just want a particular policy. It’s silly to pretend a democracy where I never get what I want is going to be more attractive than a dictatorship where I get to unleash my libidinal id.

      And you can’t just blame this on religion. Religiosity has plummeted over the last 40 years, but we seem to be as accommodating towards fascism as ever.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, one of the reasons for this movement being started decades ago, and coming to a head now, is the decline in what people considered to be the correct values, aka their values. Religion is in decline, conservative political positions are getting less popular, mainstream culture is slowly moving away from catering, pretty much, exclusively to white, straight, christians. They are being backed into a the proverbial corner. The only way they see a future for their dominance is by force.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      32% of people know their preferred way of doing things are unpopular and will not get their way unless a regime that agrees with them is in power, because democracy would favor the majority.

      Religion can of course drive an entitlement that’s very dangerous (people asserting a higher power justifies their particular view), but more mundane motivations can easily drive people to demand they are right over the majority).

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You can pretty much ask almost any insane thing and it somehow always comes out to at least 30% of Americans.

      I sometimes wonder if it’d always the same 30% and there just 30% idiots, or if that 30% spans multiple topics and groups of idiots and its actually higher like 60%

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wonder if it’s something like 25% of survey respondents are just picking the most outrageous thing and 5% actually believe that way. I remember a while ago on a survey about being ok with political violence, they tried to control for that kind of thing and it dropped the numbers a lot.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s more than that, but some of them accidentally believe that democracy is good.

    • thatKamGuy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, I imagine if someone like Bernie Sanders became Dictator for Life; the quality of life for 99.999% of Americans would improve; so purely in a thought-experiment kind of way, it works.

      The issue with even the most benelovent dictatorships is the matter of succession.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yup, that is the exact problem of benevolent dictatorships. No matter how good it is in the short term, the long term will always end in disaster at some point or another.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Braindead, or supremely selfish and would love a regime that enforces their unpopular desires over the democratic choice?

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Which is still braindead. What happens when their perfect leader can no longer serve? Even if a dictator 100% aligns with you, you’re a fool to support them.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.

      • Karl Marx

      If you go far enough left, you get your guns back!

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s not far left, that’s just left of center. Don’t buy the American bullshit that socialism is an extreme, it honestly isn’t.

        • Ele7en7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          No shit, Democrats are right leaning moderates these days. Too bad a third party has no chance at getting anywhere because I’d be all for a socialist party.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The ballot box still works AFAIK (as shit as First Past The Post voting is)

        Are you an accelerationist?

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It sounds like the person you’re responding to is saying the accelerated option isn’t being effective?

            • Kedly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Lol that’s fair. The States IS a country that considers gun ownership a HUMAN RIGHT and doesnt understand how insane lumping gun ownership with being able to access drinkable water is

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      An overwhelming majority of California and New York leftists disagree with you and have neutered themselves in order to prevent black people from organizing during the segregation era protests and now the reason is for children’s safety from school shooters.

      What do you say to those people?

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Probably the same old electoral reform gobbledegok.

        First Past The Post voting yadayadayada Ranked choice voting herpdederpdeboo state level reform possible yabbadabbadoo

        Then have them acuse me of being a secret Republican Russian because I didn’t suck Joe bidens dick with a big enough smile.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even well-meaning authoritarians can do terrible things, to say nothing of their eventual replacement. Look what happens to otherwise great companies when the founder dies and is replaced by someone just looking to maximize next quarter profits.

    What short-sighted utter fools.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hmm I wonder what 30% that is…

    I also wonder if there is any overlap between that 30% and people that have a bones for “freedom” and “liberty”

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you check the poll it’s not what you’d expect. The self-identified left had 25% support. The self-identified right had 29% support. The self-identified center had 37 PERCENT support. There’s apparently a thirst for some strong authoritarian radical centrism.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        I struggle to trust numbers nowadays. After being on Reddit for 11 years and now here on Lemmy, and around the Internet my entire life, lemme tell you about why people would self-identify as something else for a moment:

        Because they are anonymous.

        There are a huge amount of people who are on the Right on Lemmy trying to pass off as Blue, or blue-leaning.

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          As someone who is quite left, I find myself less radically left than many on Lemmy. My beliefs basically fall exactly with Bernie Sanders, which is more left than probably 95% of the entire country, but that isn’t left enough for some people.

          • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you ask people about policies and not self-identification, Bernie’s ideas have massive support from all Americans. It’s political discourse that has swung right, not the views of typical Americans.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Even without active deception there’s plenty of self-deception. People like the aesthetic of “I’m my own person, not beholden to left or right” while voting left or right every election.

      • ZombiFrancis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        That would be the ‘benevolent dictator’ crowd. Strong amongst the military and business/tech investor class.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      They could but that would be wrong since the split is only 4% between the left and right (L-25% and R - 29%).

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nope. 48 percent of Republicans, 38 percent of independents, and 29 percent of Democrats.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          I am literally reading from the article… And even with your numbers democrats are still quite terrible…

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Dude… I quoted that FROM the article.

            “A PRRI study last October found that 38 percent of Americans (and 48 percent of Republicans, 38 percent of independents, and 29 percent of Democrats) think the country needs a leader who will “break some rules if that’s what it takes to set things right.”

            Stop making shit up.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Did you notice that your numbers dont match the headlines? The headline and main part of the article is about the pew study which I quoted from.

              Stop making shit up.

              • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                So…. You didn’t even read your own article. That’s fucking embarrassing. Maybe read it. See for yourself that I copied those numbers DIRECTLY from it.

                Jesus man…. You really should delete your shit.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Susan Sontag was asked what she had learned from the Holocaust, and she said that 10% of any population is cruel, no matter what, and that 10% is merciful, no matter what, and that the remaining 80% could be moved in either direction” —Kurt Vonnegut

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I like to call that the 10-80-10 principle. That’s why it’s so important to keep the arguments up for why we should vote Blue no matter who. 10% want to fuck everyone over. And they’ve managed to convince another 22% that they are right. We’re all screwed if we don’t get the 68% that aren’t assholes to vote Blue.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    a decade later, somewhere on 4chan

    be me
    hardcore Trump supporter
    Trump wins, I’m ecstatic
    world starts going to hell, WW3 kicks off
    married with three sons, trying to keep everything together
    decide to start a construction company, war efforts boost business
    build a bunch of buildings, making bank
    get elected to local office, life is on the up and up

    land a huge contract, biggest yet
    build the place, turns out it’s a gay bar
    fml
    media catches wind, calls me part of the “woke agenda”
    sons get drafted into the war, proud but terrified
    trying to keep the family safe as the world burns
    business takes a nosedive, firebombed by extremists
    every building I’ve ever built gets torched
    house goes up in flames, barely escape with wife

    wife blames me for everything, says I’m the reason we’re targeted
    receive word from the front lines
    “All three of your sons killed in friendly fire”
    caskets arrive the next morning
    wife loses it completely, leaves the country, I’m left alone

    arrested, accused of contributing to “trans agenda”
    just a foreman trying to get by, now rotting in jail
    every dream turned to ash
    life was supposed to be perfect
    now I’m just a broken man with nothing but regret

    tfw everything falls apart because of one misguided decision

    sadpepe.jpg

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This coming from the “if you exchange freedom.for security you will enjoy neither freedom nor security” folks.

    Just a quick question: give me one, ONE simple example of a successful military dictatorship that didn’t take the country to hell and left damn near all its citizens poor, suppressed, and suffering?

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I hate a military dictatorship but to play devil’s advocate: South Korea and Taiwan?

      I’m not saying their transition to democracies was bloodless or clean but they managed. Those two are extreme examples and not models, one country built after a war that split the country in two, the other fleeing the mainland to create its own state. But I’m stretching to find a better example.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not saying their transition to democracies liberal democracies

        FTFY - so-called “liberal democracy” is about as democratic as “social darwinism” is Darwinist. And those are two terrible examples to use - they only went pretend-democratic after the fascist regimes murdered and tortured any elements in society that could be called democratic with a straight face.

        If that’s what you want for the US you might just as well start marching with the fascists.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That was my point, these hand-picked examples didn’t end up as hellholes. That said, it wasn’t always smooth, lots of blood in SK’s hand. I was playing devil’s advocate.

          In any case, the USA is not in the desperate situation these countries were in.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      France under DeGaulle?

      Edit to add: It’s not an assertio, it’s a question I don’t know the answer to.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not really. There certainly was a concentration of levers in the government, but while it certainly had authoritarian traits, it wasn’t militaristic and was still quite free. There was a healthy opposition.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also… Do you really want a military dictatorship run by right wing Christian extremists with an obsession with the end times with access to nukes? Just something to ponder about.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe the citizens weren’t suffering but their massive slave population definitely was. Heck, the reason they trained so hard was to put down slave revolts.

        • Soleos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure, but that wasn’t the question.

          There is no country, democratic or authoritarian, on this planet that currently doesn’t rely to some extent on exploited, indentured, or enslaved non-citizens, either domestic or abroad.

        • Soleos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well yeah, they asked for a simple example, I gave one. What’s wrong with that? The discussion is already in the realm of “military dictatorship” which aren’t exactly known for respecting human rights/freedoms of non-citizena. The question was about the sustainability of such systems for those deemed citizens.