• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      352 months ago

      This creates financial incentive to send these expensive soldiers to their deaths as soon as possible.

      • Sibbo
        link
        fedilink
        112 months ago

        Maybe they just print the money. Isn’t that what dictatorships often end up doing?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 months ago

          Yeah but if they send these troops to the areas that are most deadly, then they don’t have to pay them for very long in the first place.

          No need to print the money if you’re not actually spending it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I invite them to do that. I’m sure the oligarchs will love having their local savings massively devalued, and won’t support a coup of any kind. /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            12 months ago

            As much as I would love that, probably they don’t have their fortune in cash savings but most probably put it into diversified investments of some sorts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I’m guessing both, so they get returns and still have an “oh shit” fund. I doubt it would be good for the oligarchs, at the very least.

              Venezuela can do hyperinflation because they have a more ideologically driven elite who will ride out the turbulence. No such luck for Putin; he’s a neofeudal lord and has to keep palms greased like it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        I wonder who would down vote this comment like I want to know if anyone really believes that any of these soldiers will receive even a penny? please feel free to embarrass yourselves trying to prove me wrong.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        Average is a poor metric, as it accounts for the rich who steal like there’s no tomorrow in countries like Russia. Go by the minimum.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          The minimum what? I’m pretty sure the minimum is 0 in both places. The minimum salary mandated by the government? That’s just a policy, it says nothing on how realistic, widespread or sustainable it is within the two countries.

          Either way I’m sure there’s a perfect metric for a comparison, probbaly the kind of lifestyle you can attain with that income, but I’d be surprised to find it significantly different than this rough estimate.

          I also don’t believe people attracted by this prospect are economists…

        • @ThrowawayPermanente
          link
          12 months ago

          Not to underplay how bad things are in Russia, but the gini coefficient is actually a bit higher in the US

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Huh, look at that.

            That’s income, though, which is correct for this discussion. It’s the same colour on the wealth map, and I can only imagine how skewed the raw data is with all the hidden wealth.

  • @n3m37h
    link
    22 months ago

    I’m a billionaire, just because I say it doesn’t mean it is true lmao