• EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        You are trying to claim there can be no progress unless we elect enough Democrats, that’s happened before and all we’ve gotten is crumbs.

        • agamemnonymous
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          And when we don’t elect enough Democrats we don’t even get crumbs. What’s your point?

          • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            And it’s fear of losing your crumbs why people will never find their proverbial balls and do what’s right for people and society

            • agamemnonymous
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Easier to do what’s right when you’ve got crumbs to nibble on than when you’re starving. Accelerationism is a deranged and wildly privileged alternative.

              • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                Liberals have somehow convinced themselves that a slow death via poisoning is somehow better than a fast death via poisoning. The prolonged agony of society because of that poison continues to poison generation after generation.

                • agamemnonymous
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Slow death buys time for other action, it’s objectively better. No one’s saying you’re not allowed to take other actions too. They’ll be harder to enact under P2025, it’s a no brainer.

                  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    People have been saying it buys time for generations, buys time and what we have gained? Gained no more progress for civil rights and labor rights and wage rights and housing rights and healthcare rights. For the last hundred years we’ve been having the same conversations about these inequalities for several generations. And we will have these same conversations for the next few generations because we are getting nowhere because people have convinced themselves that they are buying time with a slow poison.

                    Harm reduction and buying time relies on a hypothetical worse future, so you don’t spend time concerned about the horrible present. Keeping you always asking for the potential of something better later instead of demanding a better now

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You unwittingly just told us everything we need to know. You don’t want to actually solve problems. You want to eliminate the people who created the problems. And getting rid of the people who enabled the problems doesn’t fix the problems.

          This is why you don’t understand harm reduction and aren’t actually doing anything to help address the problems. You don’t want to solve the problems. You just want to get one over on those who’ve screwed us over.

          It’s an understandable sentiment, by all means, but this is why fictional stories tend to be critical of revenge. You become so lost in punishing someone that you value vengeance over actually addressing what that person did.

          The nobles burnt the village and hurt some of the villagers for fun. Instead of rebuilding what they destroyed and helping treat the injured, you just want to kill the nobles. It’ll feel good to succeed, but the village will still need rebuilding, and the people who needed healing will be dead.

          Someone who cares more about overthrowing the industrialists, at the expense of their fellow proletariat, is no communist. They’re just one of Stalin’s useful thugs, and the only thing they’ll succeed in changing is who’s causing the problems – not solving the problem itself.

          TLDR: You don’t actually care about leftist ideals, you just want revenge.