• Old Jimmy Twodicks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        The CFPB was authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010. In addition to helping get Dodd-Frank through Congress, Obama appointed Elizabeth Warren as a special advisor to the Treasury in order to oversee the CFPB and help get it off the ground.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I pretty well hate the whole concept of capitalists building a profile about me to better manipulate me. None of this should be legal. Don’t wanna give me a loan without all this information? Good. Don’t give me a loan. Now get rid of my data. That shit is nobody’s business but mine. It’s almost certainly used for discrimination and mass manipulation as well. It’s the kind of thing one would use to knock down their political opposition.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    And of course freezing this data is possible, but you have to mail it in, along with proof of identity. 🙄

  • Anonymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Consider what would happen if employees across the globe posted to an open database about their employer, position title, salary bonus and health care information. I’m sure we’d all be sued. How is this legal?

    • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why would we be sued? It’s definitely not illegal here in Canada to discuss your employment details.

      • Anonymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t know the legal side, but employers don’t want you to talk about your compensation with anyone. Maybe it’s legal, but definitely frowned upon.

      • Technoguyfication
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not illegal in the US either, but you can still be sued by employers for doing it.

        • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          On what grounds? Surely no one with a regular job would sign a contract prohibiting them from discussing the details of their employment.

          • wrekone@lemmyf.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            And it wouldn’t matter if they did. Such contracts are not legal in the US. In fact, employers can be fined simply for requesting an employee sign a contract that restricts their right to discuss salary.

          • Technoguyfication
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You don’t need a contract. In the United States, anyone can sue anyone for anything. No laws need to have been broken nor contracts breached.

  • Zomg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nothing like seeing all 3 of the same posts by you in my feed 🥰

    /s

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      The biggest annoyance to me personally, with fediverse communities. Complete fragmentation.

      Not to say I want a centralised control, but something in the middle

      • Starbuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        It does make establishing a critical mass of comments to make a good discussion difficult. I’ve had it once or twice where I discovered a post in one community commented and didn’t get any replies, only to discover some other discussion on the same content happened elsewhere on the fediverse that I wasn’t subscribed to.

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I heard someone describe it as discussing a topic in different bars. You’ll get a slightly different niche in each space. Has its pros and cons. But beats the centralization.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have to wonder if there is a way for clients to glom together duplicate posts across your subscribed communities into one, and if you reply to a thread in that post it passes it back to the correct discussion.

        I mean, you’d still see repetitive stuff in the post’s comments from your point of view, but everything would be in one place from your perspective and it would be semi-transparent, at least for the communities you subscribe to.

        All the information is there, it should be doable…

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is what you’re supposed to do on the fediverse. Thank OP. Raise a bug with your frontend to add an option to dedupe your feed if it bothers you.