• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 months ago

    Is there a non-AI model?

    I don’t want to pay money and watts for silicon I won’t use

    • Pasta Dental
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s the kind of thing that in a few years you’ll be glad to have because some tasks will be offloaded from the GPU to the NPU, one I can think of is the background blur in video conferencing software or microphone noise suppression

        • @gravitas_deficiency
          link
          English
          212 months ago

          GPUs are already good at those things. But NPUs can be better at those things - and probably more energy efficient too - given optimized domain-specific models to work with.

          • @Jakeroxs
            link
            English
            52 months ago

            Cpus are already good enough for terminal display, why would I want a GPU? ;)

            • Aniki 🌱🌿
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              This but unironically. I’m obsessed with off-grid, low power processing. I don’t want a stupid fucking NPU I won’t need nor use.

              • @VirtualOdour
                link
                English
                12 months ago

                Then don’t get one? I don’t use tampons bit I don’t feel the need to yell about not buying them

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        That’s still something that works more than good enough without the use of an NPU. We’ll see if better use cases come out in future but I’d still prefer that power and die area go to raw CPU processing power.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      You’re likely already paying for silicon you don’t use. Take AVX512 instructions (or other more exotic instructions) for example, or unused PCIe lanes, certain encoders on your GPU etc.

      Also, people thinking they have no use for an NPU are almost certainly already using them, for example when taking a photo with their phone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The closest thing is probably the 7840HS, 7940HS or the U variants (same thing at a lower TDP so slightly slower). The 8945HS, 8845HS, etc. are very similar but with a better NPU, which you won’t want to pay for (and which still doesn’t quite meet Copilot specs), so the 7xxx ones are better value. The performance of the AI 300 looks very similar to the 7940HS. Power efficiency may be better in the new one though.

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      It’s actually extremely power efficient.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    I know they gotta do this to remain competitive and not concede that entire market subsection, but this is just one more product I won’t be buying.

    Until AI can build me a custom wooden desk or mow my lawn (there’s already robots that do that), it’s just a novelty.

    • mrddu3at2OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      This article is just more like about benchmarks of Ryzen AI 300 vs Snapdragon X Elite vs Intel Ultra, not more than that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    Will there be anything left to run it on in Windows 11 that isn’t ruined with ads and bloat?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The performance looks surprisingly close to the older 7940HS. Both look good. Shame they didn’t do a battery comparison between these two. The 7940HS doesn’t meet the Copilot requirements in it’s NPU, but I bet must people don’t care about that.