• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That statement alone says he is a candidate to be bought. If Oscar Meyer gave him a billion dollars, I’m sure he would have no choice but to make sure hot dogs are served as the only protein in grocery stores.

    • @Imgonnatrythis
      link
      English
      221 month ago

      I dunno. I could see him doing that for like $10,000.

      • chingadera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Y’all are spending money on this? Just tell that fart that it’s illegal and he’ll do it.

        • @whyNotSquirrel
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          illegal to fart?!? Noooooo

          ohh, I misread… good

    • SkaveRat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      as long as he will wear a hotdog mascot suit every time he’s in public from then on, I can see myself being okay with that

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    601 month ago

    It primarily reveals that Trump can simply be bought. He is nothing but a political whore. Weird, isn’t he?

    Will he sell state secrets and tax benefits to the highest bidder if he gets back into the White House? Most likely.

    • @jubilationtcornpone
      link
      English
      91 month ago

      It primarily reveals that Trump can simply be bought. He is nothing but a political whore. Weird, isn’t he? Will he sell state secrets and tax benefits to the highest bidder if he gets back into the White House? Most likely definitely.

      FTFY.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      It’s crazy cause the first time around everyone was talking about how Trump is rich so he can’t be bought like other politicians but looks like that has turned around pretty sharply.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Well, he used a lot of possibilities during his presidency to make money of it. Just think of the the tax-paid expensive hotel rooms in his hotels for the Secret Service people who had to protect him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 month ago

    You guys just now figured out the conservative element has gone astray from it’s original meaning? Which part did it? The big coal rolling trucks? The absolute denial that there’s a problem with the environment? Ohhhhh, it was the orange moron giving Elon the hover-hand because even American-made EVs are yucky?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 month ago

    He’s broadcasting to all businesses and billionaires that anyone who strongly supports him gets their back rubbed right back.

    He’s not saying EVs are great, that we should support them because it’s good policy, the right move for America etc.

    Its simply quid pro quo.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 month ago

    If we were smart, we would let the cheap Chinese EVs flood the US market and drive down prices in the US using competition.

    So much for the invisible hand of the market I guess. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @Habahnow
      link
      English
      371 month ago

      The reason Chinese EVs are so cheap is because China subsidizes them immensely. They’re basically selling below cost, and expecting private US companies to compete with that impossible price. As long as we allow competitors from other countries in, as well as pushing for electric vehicle usage, the prices will drop. Man companies won’t be able to sell gas cars after 2035 in many large states and countries. People would rather buy an older used gas car than a very expensive electric I bet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 month ago

        I have an ancient ICE car. Like a 2001 Honda. I bought it because it was cheap and the engine good.

        But we subsidize the fossil fuel industry and have historically subsidized the auto industry. Why not do it?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I mean, we are with tax credits if they meet certain requirements like assembly in North America, etc.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -51 month ago

            Which I don’t think really any of them do yet.

            But the whole situation is fucked. We should have been doing this properly 20 years ago.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -51 month ago

                Relatively affordable at twice the price and then some of the cheapest Chinese ev. But sure.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I was addressing your assertion that none qualify for tax credits, which is wrong. but if you want to compare the prices to Chinese EVs, NA EVs aren’t produced in china. part of the price is developing production here in the US, which we want to do.

                  You also have the option of getting a used EV with a smaller tax credit, which is what I did.

      • @fruitycoder
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        Subsidize to include worker rights suppression to include the extreme of state sanctioned slavery.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      311 month ago

      It’s a touch more complicated than that, because China doesn’t let their currency float, which makes Chinese products much cheaper in foreign markets, and foreign products more expensive in China, when the Chinese government allows them in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          I agree with you, but people need to stop looking at the economy as a “free market”.

          Almost every single government are putting restraints on one product or another.

          Yes, we want to support domestic construction. We need competition, and we don’t need to ship goods across the world as much as we do.

          But the market is not free. And that’s a good thing.

    • Bob Robertson IX
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 month ago

      In order to do that the US government would need to heavily subsidize EVs the way the Chinese government does.

      I support this… in my view the Chinese government is putting its money out there in order to get more people into an EV. The US should match their efforts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 month ago

        You mean the way we previously subsidized the regular auto industry and the supporting fossil fuel industries for… 70-90 years?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        i’m not sure heavy subsidization would work the same way in the US. We’ve already seen EV manufacturers adjust their prices based on available tax credits, so i feel like they’d just raise prices even more as subsidies increase. in china the govt can ensure this doesn’t happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Why should US gov not be able to force prizes below a curtain threshold? They just have to vote in the gov, but they can. Not?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            It’s not a matter of should or could, it’s just not something that’s going to happen. The vast majority of Americans don’t want the government directly meddling with business models to that degree.