• Aurix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    71
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean the current situation of losses versus territorial change is quite questionable for both sides.

    • nukeM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not questionable at all, though. This operation has been a resounding success. Ukraine gained hundreds of POWs that can be used to exchange for their own people, they’re digging in and holding land and resources that can later be used during negotiations, and they’ve proven not just once but twice they are capable of sudden surprise attacks that can puncture Russian lines and take huge amounts of territory in a single sweep. That last fact alone will force Russia to recalculate their placements along the front line and move more troops to reinforce perceived weak points, taking focus away from elsewhere.

      • Goldmage263
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks for explaing it so succintly for those that read after. I’ll add that this also expands the options avaliable to Ukraine in future combat fronts, pulling Russian attention and resources, and likely securing more current information on Russian troops. Not that Aurix will try to think about it or be convinced.

        • nukeM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          No worries, NCD isn’t for everyone. 👋

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        3 months ago

        What if Putin just screams, “nukes nukes nukes!”? Should everyone immediately capitulate, thereby ensuring every other country in the world chases nukes for leverage?

            • Dutczar@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              3 months ago

              Hasn’t he threatened to use nukes multiple times over the war already? Ignoring the threats generally worked out.

              • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                3 months ago

                His problem is nukes can only be used as a last resort when your country already has started to fall, otherwise you will trigger your own country to fall quite soon after (retaliation strikes, sanctions, fallout, riots, etc)

                So nobody will take it as a serious threat in response to anything less than a major attack on the capital or equivalent.

            • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              OK, but I still don’t really get what this has to do with the original comment. I think it wasn’t really the right place to put this.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 months ago

          Using nukes is a cry for desperation by Putin, and that would look bad for him for the Russians and for the rest of the world.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          He tried that, and it’s suspected USA sent him a picture of a nuke with the coordinates of his secreted bunker written on it, with “you die first” below