Democrats have made restoring abortion access a cornerstone of their campaign for the White House and Congress, but there are divisions over what, exactly, that means.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Given the deplorable state of women’s health even before Roe was struck down, might be a good idea to go farther and throw out the Hyde Amendment while you’re at it. There’s no compelling reason to deny women access to contraception and termination as part of Medicaid, given that this was routinely available through private insurance for decades.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      3 months ago

      i doubt she’ll do anything beyond roe given as how she won’t even stop helping bomb defenseless people from the sky.

      • ArbitraryValue
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You might not like it, but most Democrats will vote for both protecting abortion rights and supporting Israel.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re a lot more efficacious at supporting Netanyahu’s genocide than they are at protecting abortion rights.

          • ArbitraryValue
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Inflammatory language aside, supporting Israel is a lot easier because both parties favor it. Meanwhile the Democrats have to fight the Republicans about abortion.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Referring to selling weapons to a genocidal apartheid regime as “SuPpOrTiNg IsRaEl” is genocide apologia. If you don’t like being called out on it, good.

              • ArbitraryValue
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                You can refer to it however you like; I don’t mind. However, I don’t think that your approach is going to convince anyone who doesn’t already agree with you.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You might not like it, but most Democrats will vote for both protecting abortion rights and supporting Israel.

          that sounds ideal; why would anyone not like it?

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            There are a lot of people who don’t like Israel for varying reasons

            Being an American ally and being Jewish isn’t the most popular combination in the region

            Then there’s the humanist approach where they keep killing and torturing civilians

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        America is first and foremost a military complex. They’re loving this moment in history because they get to pound out tons of armaments for Israel and Ukraine, and not get put in hot water for putting American soldiers at risk. Of course they won’t stop it. One of the largest spends is US militarism.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It isn’t enough. We need codified guarantees of an unalienable right to bodily autonomy for all citizens, with explicit statements clarifying that the people have a right to abortion and contraception so that courts can’t willfully misinterpret the law.

    As a stepping stone to that goal reinstating roe is a good first step.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      But also phrased in such a way that anti-vaxxers can’t hide behind some flimsy excuse and endanger us all

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Add “if you want to put yourself at risk that’s cool. If you want to put your society at risk then you need to leave it. Deserters will receive one Coleman pup tent and water for 3 days. No weapons.”

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why in the gods damned fuck does congress get a say in my medical decisions‽ Especially considering they aren’t even paying for them.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why in the gods damned fuck does congress get a say in my medical decisions

      Because keeping the filibuster around is a higher priority than human rights.