I know this isn't the traditional greentext 
but I'm doing this on Lemmy anyways

> Browse Lemmy
> See progressive political post
> See comments
> See Anti-nazi comment
> 100 something upvotes, 1 downvote

Alright, who's the fascist among us?
  • Pechente@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably the guy using some weird lemmy client that’s in alpha that triggered a swipe gesture without the user noticing it.

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have fat fingers, okay? Sometimes I notice I’ve voted on something before it’s even visible on my screen

  • festnt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    probably the same guy who downvoted you

    ps: totally wasnt me

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    sigh I thought we’d learnt this by now.

    Repeat after me:

    Upvoting a post is a signal that the post is good content, not that you endorse the content

    Downvoting a post is a signal that the post is abusive, spammy, trolling, or otherwise bad, not that you personally disapprove

    • nehal3m
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      The purpose of a system is what it does.

      • [email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        As far as changing how users use up/downvotes, I can see two methods. The expedient method is admin banning “abusers,” and that would cause a monumental shitshow. Forcing the issue is just going to kill an instance. Admin posts and continuous calls to action, on the other hand, would elicit ironic downvoters but has a chance of gradually shifting attitudes. Honestly doesn’t seem worth the grief either way.

  • KellysNokia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t dislike political content because I don’t agree with it, but because it all feels like a circle-jerk

    Through selection bias the fediverse is already composed of a very particular demographic, and patting each other on the back for our similar views feels like a waste of energy

    My motive for moving to the fediverse was to remove the centralized control, which it does well, but the lack of diversity hurts the range of stimulating content