• norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    Last Generation Austria (Letzte Generation Österreich) disbanded recently, because they can’t handle legal fees anymore. Others are on the same path.

    While protesters for other causes face no consequences, climate protesters get arrested regularly.

    For example farmers in Germany protested that they don’t get subsidies anymore for using diesel engines, blocked and hindered main streets, people and buisnesses. Held a ferry full of people hostage because a politican with his family was on board, with no real negative or legal consequences.

    German government caved to the farmers, while at the same time charging climate activists en mass for blocking highways and such.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is not just climate protesters getting the brunt. Anyone protesting for human rights, anti discrimination, anti fascism or any progressive cause will get various levels of supression, if not just straight up police violence.

      Meanwhile literal Nazis are treated fairly nicely and during Covid the police was beating up permitted protests to make way for non permitted Nazi/Esoteric/Conspiracy protests.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Certain countries, such as the one where The Guardian is based, have long been infiltrating, surveilling and even using anti-Terrorism legislation against Ecologist groups.

    They treat Far-Right extremism significantly more mildly than Environmentalism.

    • Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      France used anti-terrorist legislation to prevent ecologist groups to demonstrate (by legally forcing them to stay home) during the G7 summit in Paris

  • lurch (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s no secret that protesting is very inefficient, but it’s also mostly peaceful and more ethical than other methods.

    Politicians should just remember, that people will be forced to use the unethical, less peacful alternatives, once they can’t protest any more.

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Inefficient ineffective

      Protests don’t work if the governing body has no respect for the voice of the people.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The entire history of civil disobedience begs to differ.

        Protests are how people make the government respect them.

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Changing policy? Sure, do it with signcards and gatherings. But when the people do overthrow their oppressors, it is with force of some kind.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Who said that civil disobedience is not force?

            Regardless, we always need a combined arms approach, a … diversity of tactics if you will…

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, you mean climate protest is working, it’s becoming actually dangerous to the system.

  • lnxtx@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Rich counties” - what is the definition? Who is the rich?

    • Nester@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The report this article is based on is actually called “On Thin Ice: Disproportionate Responses to Climate Change Protesters in Democratic Countries”

      The title of the article is a bit misleading including the term “rich countries”, especially as that term is not used once in the article.

      In my mind measuring the level of democracy is harder than the wealth of a nation.