• arefx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Fall Out 4, mediocre.

      Fall Out 76, bad.

      Starfield, bad.

      I fully expect tes6 to be ass.

        • taladar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ideas are cheap, you can literally list a hundred ideas for good games in a day. The hard part is an implementation that matches your imagination of what it would be like.

          • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            and this fact makes things worse because it’s their in-house engine and if they can’t make their ideas and execution work on their own framework that’s an even bigger failure. It’s not like they were trying to learn Unreal while making their game

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Their engine is not the issue. Starfield in particular needed a lot more investment into making their engine work for that style of game, but it is functional for FO and TES. Switching to UE would require building a ton of tools, creating a lot of new tech, and having the team learn to use it. UE isn’t just some perfect engine you can swap over to. It has tons of issues and things you need to learn. The bones of it are as old as the Creation Engine’s too.

              My biggest issue with Starfield was the writing. The stories were boring and mostly didn’t make sense. They also forced you down one or two paths, even when other options should have been available. This is also true for their other games, but much less noticeable.

              They’ve also been removing the player’s ability to make their own fun in the world, and instead you just have to follow what they’ve given you. For example, no spell crafting in Skyrim, and very limited enchanting. Why? They still aren’t balanced. They’re just less fun and interesting.

              • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                points taken, but what I meant was that they of all people should be able to make the best possible game on their engine. if they were making the game on a new engine it’d be easier to understand if their eyes were bigger than their stomach due to their inexperience

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        been playing Fallout:NV and its so good. They should go back to using elder scrolls as a way to show off new engines and then license them out to new companies to make games.

        Skyrim should be seen as an abberation here. If the game turns out good thats just a plus

        • n3m37h
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          New Vegas was made by Obsidian in 18 months

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            yeah that’s the point, Bethesda generally builds an ok game and engine and puts an above average mod/design system on it. Obsidian is far better at making actual video games.

    • GHiLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re 100% right. I don’t expect Bethesda to make anything good.