I’m curious what the difference is between Balenca etcher and Ventoy for writing isos to a live USB for distro hopping purposes. I see both recommended in fourms. Is there any advantage to using one over the other? Are they both equally safe/secure?

I’m also curious about trying out new distros. I’ve been using LMDE for about a year now and it’s been fine, but I want to expand my knowledge and see whether LMDE is my favorite distro or not. I’m not the most well versed in Linux and don’t have any prior programming experience so a beginner/mid level distro is what I’m looking for. I want something I can test out without connecting to WiFi (so not arch).

  • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You’re comparing apples to oranges here, but of course Ventoy is a more versatile tool, after one time preparation you’re just copying ISOs like files, you can use multiple ISOs at once etc, also do you really need a clunky electron app to burn images on Linux

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Love ventoy. That one usb becomes a Swiss army chainsaw.

    But as said elsewhere it hides proprietary blobs among other things.

  • maniii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I use Ventoy regularly but im too lazy to setup Grub2 on a USB and load up isos.

    Not sure who these Ventoy fanbois or bros are.

    Yup Ventoy does hide binary blobs and has some dodgy devs and code. Use at own risk.

    Also I dont have any sensitive stuff. So mostly Ventoy is used to install playground server isos and stuff. Not much use for it otherwise.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Balena Etcher is a writer that does one ISO at a time. Other similar options are Fedora Writer, Rufus, etc.

    Ventoy is one that can do multiple ISOs and is generally easy to manage.

    However, be aware that Ventoy has a lot of unknown code involved. There’s binary blobs that the maintainer refuses to open source, so there’s a big question over whether it’s hiding some malware or is using unpatched packages. Nobody knows except the maintainer, and it’s just his word saying it’s safe. You could use it to test out ISOs, but I wouldn’t personally use it to actually install a system.

    Also, the Ventoy fanbois are pretty insufferable, and they tend to brigade anyone that speaks ill of Ventoy or its dev.

    If you want something similar that’s open source, Glim works and could be a good option; YUMI has been around for a while, but I dunno if it’s still a good project or not.

    Edit: typo

    • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Also, the Ventoy fanbois are pretty insufferable, and they tend to brigade anyone that speaks ill of Ventoy or its dev.

      I more often see a different picture, where any mention of Ventoy leads to unreasonable agression and screams about how storing multiple ISOs on the same disk is useless.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I have quite literally never seen that. The majority of the time, somebody brings up Ventoy, somebody mentions the opaque blobs or some other legitimate criticism, and a bunch of fanbois pile onto that person for having their own opinions or concerns.

        Ventoy works well, but the lack of transparency concerns me and people like me.

    • maniii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Cool! I might give that a try instead of the Ventoy i use regularly. Thanks for the info !

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Can you point to some discussion of the ventoy blobs? I had never heard about that and can’t find anything that says it’s not GPL3.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This thread made me look at this issue. Realistically it’s not a big issue, the VAST majority of the binary blobs are accounted for and have a script or a readme file that shows where they’re downloaded from.

        That being said I will take a serious look at alternatives.

        • AlligatorBlizzard
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Should I be worried? I was distro hopping for a bit and put together a Ventoy drive to make that easier, and I used it to boot the install iso for the distro I ultimately decided on for my gaming laptop. It seemed highly recommended and I didn’t know about the Ventoy bros at that point.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Probably not. I’ve used it as well (before I knew about Glim) to preview distros, but I am not using it to do installs, since I can’t be certain what’s in it.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I liked etcher before balena bought it. The cli was small and easy to use. After the buyout it got super bloated.

    USBImager does the same thing.

  • Leaflet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Belena is simpler, it’s just writing an image to a drive.

    Ventoy is complicated and changes the booted image to make it work. That sometimes breaks things.