• Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Reportedly, one of the financial backers kept it from being distributed because he thought it was going to portray Trump in a flattering light (edit: and was angry that it didn’t). The only reason it’s now being released is because his share was bought out.

    • rustydrd
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not what I’ve heard. The movie’s creator recently gave an interview on the The New Yorker Radio Hour, where he cited as one of the difficulties the film faced with financial backers and distributors that it included a scene of Trump raping Ivana Trump (a claim she later recanted under pressure from Trump’s lawyers).

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s what I’m talking about, as well as scenes showing Trump using amphetamines.

        Dan Snyder, who donated over $1 million to Trump’s campaign and also backed this film, was reportedly angry about the negative portrayals of Trump. He kept fighting the release of the movie until his company’s stake in the film was bought out, which is why it’s being shown now.

        Source.

        • rustydrd
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ah, gotcha. The podcast doesn’t make it sound so drastic, but it goes in a similar direction.