• zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    89
    ·
    2 months ago

    Politics is so basic

    1. Polling shows electorate are concerned about age of candidates
    2. ditch aged candidate
    3. attack opponents aged candidate
    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup. One side proved they were actually concerned about the age of the candidates and did something about it while the other digs their heads in the sand and ignores reality.

      Sure seems to be a super common theme these days…

      • zante@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        64
        ·
        2 months ago

        So when did this “actual concern” begin ?

        It was never mentioned until the Hur report raised doubts. Then Biden received fulsome support from the party.

        • gravitas_deficiency
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wtf planet are you on dude?

          Say the name of the Democratic presidential nominee:

        • Soulg
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Hur report alleviated doubts. What the fuck are you talking about

          • zante@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why so aggressive?

            Hur said of Biden “he’s and elderly man with a poor memory”

            Following that, he was roundly supported by the party.

            • Soulg
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Did you ignore the congressional hearing where it was demonstrated that Hur lied and omitted facts to spin that narrative?

              • zante@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                2 months ago

                You just said he alleviated doubts ……but now you say he was found to be lying ?

                What are you trying to say ?

                Look, a few weeks ago, the democrats went out of their way to defend a doddery old man and told you everything was fine. Then when polling data changed, They kicked him out him, and started using age and infirmity as an attack line.

                If you don’t see hypocrisy in that, and you don’t see the lack of integrity in that, and the general cheap shittery in that, then you are part of the great unthinking electorate .

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago
      1. Parties attack either other for having aged candidates.
      2. Party ditches aged candidate, since electorate doesn’t want aged candidate–other party doubles down on old/mentally declining candidate and refuses to reconsider
      3. Party attacks aged candidate
      4. Omg who could have seen that coming
    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, its bizarre. Its almost as if the sections of electorate that complained about age never really cared about i the first place.