Lina Khan, you’re a goshdarn hero.
Why all big money donors to Harris asked her to remove Khan. Does anyone know Harris stance on this? We know for a fact Trump will boot her and we start getting fucked again. What will Harris commit to?
She said multiple times before being the candidate it would never be considered. I don’t see her being asked or answering any questions about it publicly, but the blowback from the party would be swift and immense, and pretty much lose her any centrist anti-monopoly party votes if she’s tries to run again, which is a big crowd.
She must be protected at all costs.
This is awesome, we need more rules like this, and Khan is absolutely nailing it. But I’m worried it won’t stick. I think companies have taken our absentmindedness and laziness for granted, and have made tons of money because of it. I don’t think they’ll give that up without a fight, but hopefully they lose. Unless the Supreme Court gets involved, and then we can all but guarantee they’d rule against these consumer protections.
“Too often, businesses make people jump through endless hoops just to cancel a subscription,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a statement. “The FTC’s rule will end these tricks and traps, saving Americans time and money. Nobody should be stuck paying for a service they no longer want.”
It’s such a basic and obvious consumer protection.
Coming soon to a Supreme Court near you:
“It is this Court’s opinion that this rule infringes on businesses’ First Amendment right to free speech.”
Now that they’ve thrown out the Chevron Doctrine they can just say “There isn’t an explicit law that says you can do that so you can’t.”
Yup. “Bumblefucks DVD emporium” will oddly have 100k to splash out on lawyers to sue in that one Texas federal court with a Trump judge that refuses to abide by random cases being distributed, and this will be on hold for the whole country. The supreme courts shadow docjet will then affirm it with no comment, and then we wait for it to reach them, where they will release an opinion on the last day saying it’s illegal, and also so is the FTC, and also senators are kings like presidents.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce criticized the administration’s approach, saying in August that “heavy-handed regulations that micromanage business practices” will lead to higher costs for consumers.
this is either them saying since they cant mooch off people who want to cancel they will raise prices… or that somehow making a “cancel” button online will cost more in staffing, neither is an amazing pov to have
The Chamber of Commerce, whether the national one or your local group of rich assholes, are only for the benefit of business over the consumer. And they deliberately encourage public confusion. Many (most?) people think they are a government agency and not just a group of corporations colluding in the common interest of making as much money as possible.
Having a cancel button instead of staffing call centers should lower costs, no?
That’s the beauty of it. They understaff the call centre to ensure long wait times in the hope you will give up
Yes, that’s why I included it with my comment. Their either claiming that somehow that is going to raise costs, for that they’re going to lose more money because people are actually able to not pay for the thing they didn’t want to pay for
didn’t you know that due to covid and no wants to work anymore costs have tripled while you have been on hold.
Organizational structure and membership of the Chamber of Commerce.
Just deleted Uber from my phone. If they’re gonna use my payments to turn around and lobby to keep me locked into subscriptions that don’t even involve them, I’m gonna be a lyft guy from now on.
the US Chamber of Commerce is almost entirely an advocate of bad ideas. Generally most companies don’t mind promoting and taking credit for good ideas. You push it in the chamber of commerce when you know its a shitty idea and you don’t want credit for it.
About time. Retro Fitness gym wanted a notarized letter from someone I know explaining why they no longer wanted the membership. Absolute insanity.
What the actual fuck? I’d send them a notarized bag of flaming dog shit.
I WANNA QUIT THE GYM!!!
Hey, we can quit the bank! Cut them off at the source!
I WANNA QUIT THE BANK!!!
(The fact that Friends made an episode about this 30 years ago shows how long it’s been a problem…)
Looks like certified mail, not notarized. But still, ridiculous. https://retrofitness.com/faq/
Thanks for looking it up. It was a few years ago, so maybe I messed up the details along the way or the local branch manager was just being a dick to prevent a lost membership.
I’d say if they didn’t require certified mail to sign up, then no way is certified mail needed to cancel
The idea that someone can say “You’re not allowed to not want my product, now pay the fuck up.” is the most asinine thing I’ve ever heard.
I want her on a stamp,now, will pay for multiple books!
I had to threaten Century Link with a lawsuit if they didn’t let me cancel my account on the phone yesterday.
That’s all well and good, but where are our internet privacy rules?
I mean, there are definitely people in the government working on it, but those often require much more substantial reforms and systemic changes before the changes could functionally work. (i.e. banning data brokers would kill off most free services, or banning targeted ads would kill most ad-funded news networks)
If you haven’t already, I recommend using the EFF’s Action Center to let your representatives know about specific changes you would and would not want made to our laws to protect privacy, free speech, and digital innovation, according to what they’ve found to be the most pressing issues at the moment.
deleted by creator
My understanding is that Net Neutrality is not the same as privacy. The first is concerned with providers not discriminating against the data being sent/received. The second is about tracking all the data that is being sent/received (and more).
Uhhhhhh…nonexistant. Fuck you peasant!
I mean, I kid, but that’s essentially big tech’s stance on the issue.
