FTA:

A federal judge on Friday granted former U.S. President Donald Trump leeway to publicly share some non-sensitive evidence that will be used in his trial on charges of plotting to overturn the 2020 election, but she warned him to tread carefully before making inflammatory public statements about the case.

“Even arguably ambiguous statements by the parties or their counsel- if they can be reasonably interpreted to intimidate witnesses or to prejudice potential jurors - can threaten the process," U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said on Friday.

“I caution you and your client to take special care in your public statements about this case. I will take whatever measures are necessary to safeguard the integrity of these proceedings.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3811 months ago

    Why does the law treat this guy like he’s special? He has 78 felony charges and he’s still walking around on the street spewing bullshit and inciting violence. I’m skeptical that he will be held accountable if he puts witnesses in danger with inflammatory public statements.

    • spaceghotiOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      This judge has already encountered him once, and he didn’t enjoy the experience. If anyone is willing and capable of bringing him to heel, it’s Judge Chutkan. She doesn’t tolerate his shit and he knows it, which is why he’s requesting a change of venue.

      • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
        link
        2211 months ago

        But that’s ignoring the point that anyone normal person would be in jail based purely on attempted intimidation towards the legal system. If he didn’t have people at every level of govt choking on his micro penis he’d have already been tried by now

        • spaceghotiOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1211 months ago

          I don’t disagree, he’s still getting special treatment and he doesn’t deserve it. But like it or not, he’s claiming political persecution and the judge can’t ignore the political ramifications of that. So she’s being cautious and giving him just enough rope to hang himself with. The odds are excellent that he’ll ignore her clear warning and attempt to intimidate witnesses anyway. At that point the record will show that he earned custody in a way that no one can seriously dispute (not that this will stop Fox News and Republicans anyway).

          It’s not fair, but she is playing this smart.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            811 months ago

            He was always going to claim that. That’s his position on everything. Caving to any demand will only give him cause to do it again and louder next time.

            • spaceghotiOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              711 months ago

              You and I both know that, but that’s how the game is being played. It’s a huge fucking problem that demands reform, but Republicans have been in lockstep trying to block any attempt to constrain their corruption. And when this goes to the Supreme Court with the current justices on the bench, don’t be surprised if they find some convoluted argument that protects Republican privilege over the public good.

              This is the world we created when we pretended Hillary wasn’t the better option and allowed Trump to win.

    • @Bread
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It is not designed to stop him, it is designed to give him the ability to fuck himself over. If he breaks the rules, the judge will have no other choice but to move the trial up to as early as August 28th on the next free trial date to help reduce damage. The government wants to do it in January and the Republican party wants it be done after the election.

      I say the earlier the better. If you are going to it, leave it so there is no reasonable argument that could be used to say it was unfair.

  • Jordan Lund
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1511 months ago

    Why stop at witnesses? Should be lawyers and judges too… He shouldn’t be threatening ANYONE involved with the case.

  • DarkGamer
    link
    fedilink
    1211 months ago

    He will keep threatening people, he always has. Jail him. He can be tried from custody.

    • pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      Lock him up!

      But no seriously, if he’s warned and he still does it, he needs to finally have consequences. He has never, ever faced real consequences for his misdeeds.

  • StarServal
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    Let’s start the bidding at 24hours. Do I hear 24? 24? 24 hours? 24! Can I get 23hours? 23?

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    maybe he’s just not mentally competent to stand trial… if they test him and his IQ is below 80, does he become a ward of the state?

  • Overzeetop
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    “Stop, or I’ll say ‘Stop’ again.”

    Call me when he’s actually in jail for contempt of court.