• Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is stupid. How about you make a play for disenchanted progressives who actually could be convinced to vote for you? Republicans are not going to vote for Harris in any great numbers. The evidence is in the fact that every republican who has come out to support Harris is retired from politic life either by choice or by having been voted out by the rabid faction that makes up the vast bulk of the republican base. Republican voters make up about 30% of eligible voters and democrats make up another ~30%. How about you go after the 40% that sit between the two groups by making it worth their while to get off the couch and go vote?

    • Soulg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because progressives are probably smart enough to know why they need to vote for Harris instead of letting fascism keep them on their couch

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The thing is progressive policy gets the votes Harris is chasing here too

      When Obama flipped red ststaes in 08 it wasn’t because progressives turned out, because progressives always turn out.

      He flipped red states by flipping moderate voters with progressive policy.

      While moderates have favored the Democratic candidate in each of the past five elections, Barack Obama gained the support of more voters in the ideological “middle” than did either John Kerry or Al Gore before him. He won at least half the votes of independents (52% vs. 49% for Kerry), suburban voters (50% vs. 47% for Kerry), Catholics (54% vs. 47% for Kerry), and other key swing groups in the electorate.

      https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2008/11/05/inside-obamas-sweeping-victory/

      And that’s even with the PUMA movement Clinton’s campaign started to get Dems to vote for Kerry.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_United_Means_Action

      Even if we lose some votes, progressive policy is a net gain.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      How about you go after the 40% that sit between the two groups by making it worth their while to get off the couch and go vote?

      They can’t or won’t because their bread is buttered by the same people buttering the bread of Republicans: rich donors and SuperPACs.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The evidence is in the fact that every republican who has come out to support Harris is retired from politic life either by choice or by having been voted out by the rabid faction that makes up the vast bulk of the republican base.

      Your evidence shows that Republicans whose careers no longer depend on Trump are the ones who can be convinced to turn on him. The same is true of many (formerly) Republican voters.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is stupid. How about you make a play for disenchanted progressives who actually could be convinced to vote for you?

      Democrats would rather lose democracy forever than treat progressives like constituents with agency.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Progressives who dont vote for Harris are even dumber than Republicans. Not sure if talking to them would help since they would need to stop focussing on breathing just to listen to you.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        There are plenty of people in the area between the two extremes who support progressive policies, while not considering themselves progressives, but are not sufficiently motivated to bother voting because neither candidate is explicitly supporting those policies. Those are the votes that are available. Those are the people she should be convincing, not low hanging republican fruit.