• goatOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They seem to dislike france’s freedom of speech and their anti-islam stance.

      … No, it does not make sense. I don’t have a clue.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I think it has more to do with Macron and his bedding of right-wing fascists to avoid a left-wing government coalition

        That, and their funding of religious ethnostate terrorists…

        Edit: i don’t get it, is it something I said?

        Edit 2: OK, I was wrong about the specific context of the comment, but I’ll take partial credit for guessing it had to do with the war in Gaza

        • goatOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yes, the dislike of a democratically elected leader is reasonable clause to call for innocent french people to die in a massacre

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I didn’t say it was reasonable, I was only answering the question as to why they were angry with France.

            I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

            • goatOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

              Are you trying to say the West deserves violence? Advocating for violence isn’t allowed in this community or instance.

                • goatOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  And what will this justice be? Because the post is saying a massacre.

                  I think it’s pretty telling you were advocating for violence, and now you’re forced to backtrack.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    I wasn’t advocating for anything, I was answering the question about why they were angry with the french.

                    And what will this justice be?

                    If it were me, i’d say the west should face international sanction and prosecution in the Hague for all leaders/diplomats accused of willfully collaborating with a genocide. Of course, a western-controlled criminal court would never do such a thing, so I guess all we have is BDS and public protest.