• DoYouNot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is exactly why we need unions. Just like not having weekends off, it’s normal until it isn’t.

      • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh man that’s rough, I’m sorry you’ve not had that. I hope you’ve managed to find other opportunities to spend time with family or do things that you enjoy

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some industries are weekend industries; for Hospitality, Retail and Tourism, Saturday and Sunday are the equivalent of Monday and Tuesday for the 9-5 crowd.

      That said, Monday and Tuesday are usually the Saturday and Sunday for these workers. Us “Normies” don’t usually particle in fine dining, clubbing or tourist traps on Monday and Tuesdays.

      You are right though, Retail and Hospitality workers do need to get better unions so they can get paid a living wage and aren’t being forced to work 7 days a week for 12 hour shifts.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      This whole thing with a series of “CommentX” accounts started because I wrote on reddit once that I hoped for this guy’s death, got permabanned, and made my first new account. I think I was up in the 140’s on reddit recently, still haven’t made an alt for lemmy since I started with 105.

      But this specific guy, who I don’t usually hear much from because I don’t seek out content from/about that environment, said something so ugly about how good he thought poverty and struggle was, that it made me wish the worst for him.

      It’s not that he’s much worse than the other guys in his wealth class, I mean he’s still up there but not #1 big bad by any means, but he’s just so fucking overtly classist and apparently in love with the suffering of those beneath him, it’s shocking.

      It’s disappointing to be reminded of him, and that my wish upon a star wasn’t fulfilled. He should’ve been in that submarine.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Where’s all the action? All I’ve seen is the sub guy and a ship captain actually follow through

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        If I was actively planning on murdering some of the richest people on earth, I wouldn’t talk about it on social media.

        People you’re talking about OWN the violence needed to stop them.

        What I would be doing is joining the organizations that control the violence and either disrupt or try and take control of some or all of it.

        History is going to be very unkind to people like Biden who has the means and legal right to mobilize and contain the fascists that ended American democracy and destroyed modern civilization

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          You join the violent organisations, either you are assimilated, or you are cast out (or worse). That’s how they work.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are just under 3000 billionaires in the world. The questions to ask are:

      Do you start with the richest and move down the list or start at the bottom and see if the top ones give their money away before you get to them?

      Do you sharpen the blade after it starts taking more than one blade drop or just enjoy the tension of the longer show?

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m thinking more of a parallelized operation, and where their holdings have been nationalized or otherwise socialized beforehand so they wouldn’t really have the option to give their money away.

        • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I should have been more specific and said Give their companies to the nationalized system of ownership and money into the tax coffers.

  • merc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    2 months ago

    He’ll fire workers… what workers exactly? As far as I can tell, he hasn’t actually run a business in 25 years. He got rich when Mattel bought his company in 1999, but then they fired him. He invested in a storage facility company, was on the board of directors but never actually had any employees reporting to him, and then he sold that investment, making him more money.

    Since then, he’s had a number of vanity projects name after himself: O’Leary Funds, O’Leary Ventures, O’Leary Books, O’Leary Fine Wines, I don’t know if any of them are still in business, but if they are, I can’t imagine he has more than a handful of employees.

    Now he’s just a reality TV personality, so of course he’s going to say bullshit that gets him in the spotlight.

    Why would anybody take advice from a reality TV personality who hasn’t managed any employees in a quarter of a century? Especially given that he’s probably just saying bullshit to get his name in the spotlight again.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is guy’s grift is playing daddy capitalist while real owners do actual capitalism.

      A useful whore for the regime.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why can’t these regulations be actual crimes, with criminal consequences for the perpetrator. And if he’s ordering someone else to do the firing, it’s “conspiracy to commit regulatory fraud”.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not about money. It’s about being a petty tyrant and lording over the peasants.

    Fuck the wealthy.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Alternatively we could just get whoever designed Lady Gaga’s ridiculous meat suit from a decade back, get another one made, put it on Mr. Punchable Face here, and toss him into an actual shark tank.

        That seems fitting.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought the German term for someone needing a fist to the face was Nazi.

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Up next on the news: abusive boss wonders why he can’t retain staff. Should the board step in? Shareholders say yes

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nobody should give a shit what another reality TV show host business marketing shill grifter has to say about labor regulations. He’s the last person I would care about an opinion from on the topic. Not seeing a link, did the article also include a response from labor leaders?

    • Rekorse
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dreams-crap-kevin-oleary-slams-110400900.html

      Unsurprisingly, the article is more nuanced than the title.

      For example, he states he has fired people in the past for not answering an after hours emergency, while the title seems to me to say he would fire people despite the new law.

      The article does include a response and background from labor leaders in Australia, as that is the most recent country to enact this law.

      But I entirely agree about his character, and he’s the worst person on that shark tank show too. I dont know ive ever agreed with a quote of his in an article.

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, its now we’re putting some restraints on these children who have been free to do what ever and now they’re having an entitled little tantrum about it, because god fobid the peasants get to relax.

  • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    He wants employees to have the same dedication that he has. The thing is, it is not our company, and we certainly don’t get paid millions of dollars. We have other things to do on our own time than making money for you.

    • ShareMySims
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      He wants employees to have the same dedication that he has.

      Don’t be confused - he is categorically not as dedicated as he expects his employees to be, but far, far, far less.

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      He wants employees to be dedicated to making him money so he doesn’t have to.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it’s a new regulation to not answer phones off the clock, isn’t firing the employee for it illegal?

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes. But you can best believe they will find something else to fire you for. If you have nothing, then it’s an easy case win for you.