• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      My wife and I are Southern socialist libtards and usually vote in camo. We’ve debated open carrying but decided it wasn’t worth the hassle.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Describing an 18 year old as a “teen” certainly is a choice. And not one commonly made when the person accused of a crime is black.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, teen is literally in the word, but you know that the implication is not “an adult legally responsible for their actions” and the choice of how to describe an alleged criminal is not applied similarly to white and black subjects. A 15 year old black boy will be described as a “black male” while a legally adult white man will be a “teen” until the day of their 20th birthday.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That does not matter, by law, he is an adult. The term “teen” is used when under 18 in the news. This is clear bias because of his race.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            Literally just repeating the originally argument instead of responding to the responses. Go fuck yourself.

            • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              39 minutes ago

              It’s not their fault they were born with an understanding of nuance that was two sizes too small

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If I told you, “Gary’s fucking a teenager,” I’m guessing you wouldn’t assume that teenager was over 18 and would be thinking maybe the authorities should be contacted.

            • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I absolutely would. Do you watch porn? There’s a whole “teen” category

              • Baggins@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 minutes ago

                And quite a few of those ‘teens’ are well over twenty.

                Or so I was told.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Sorry… you would “absolutely” assume that if I told you that “Gary [i.e. someone we both know on a first-name basis] is fucking a teenager” that the person was of legal age because of a porn category?

                Because I’m pretty sure we don’t mutually know a porn star named Gary.

                This also makes me worried about your feelings on incest.

                • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Wow wtf is that kind of strawman? Do you not see the basic correlation between “fucking a teenager” and “fucking a teenager in porn”? porn has normalized that fucking a teenager is 18

          • escapedgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            We all get it, the type of porn you watch is still legal even though it has teen in the name.

            This is regarding a legal matter where the man’s sentence will likely be decided by the fact that the court sees him as an adult. In most cases and as the other user pointed out 18 year olds are referred to as men in a legal context. This disturbingly seems to be the standard practice when describing black males of 18.

            Generally speaking, describing alleged criminals as teens implies a lack of legal agency and thus biases the reader toward compassion. The point is that sometimes language can induce bias and consistency is needed. If that consistency falls towards the technicality of having the word teen in their name so be it, but that is not the case with our current media landscape.

    • Hideakikarate
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The issue is that they make terrible Dutch Ovens and the smells waft.