Candace Fails screamed for someone in the Texas hospital to help her pregnant daughter. “Do something,” she pleaded, on the morning of Oct. 29, 2023.

Nevaeh Crain was crying in pain, too weak to walk, blood staining her thighs. Feverish and vomiting the day of her baby shower, the 18-year-old had gone to two different emergency rooms within 12 hours, returning home each time worse than before.

The first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. At the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. But doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that Crain was fine to leave.

Now on Crain’s third hospital visit, an obstetrician insisted on two ultrasounds to “confirm fetal demise,” a nurse wrote, before moving her to intensive care.

By then, more than two hours after her arrival, Crain’s blood pressure had plummeted and a nurse had noted that her lips were “blue and dusky.” Her organs began failing.

Hours later, she was dead.

Fails, who would have seen her daughter turn 20 this Friday, still cannot understand why Crain’s emergency was not treated like an emergency.

But that is what many pregnant women are now facing in states with strict abortion bans, doctors and lawyers have told ProPublica.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      23 days ago

      I have been saying anti-abortion instead of pro-life. But I feel like there must be another simply-expressed term to reflect their thinking. Something along the lines of anti-women or just anti-choice. I dunno.

        • jballs
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          23 days ago

          Yeah but in cases like this, it was forced death.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        23 days ago

        It’s absolutely anti-choice. The party of small government (except when it comes to controlling people).

      • Mouselemming
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        23 days ago

        Forced-birth and anti-autonomy are other options that may be useful. Sex-punishers is another one.

        • jballs
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          23 days ago

          Honestly, it is all about sex punishment. In the conservative mind, getting pregnant is a consequence of sex - and if you need an abortion, then you shouldn’t have had sex. It’s that simple to them.

          They don’t think in terms of medical problems or grey areas. Just: had sex, got pregnant, deal with the consequences.

          • Mouselemming
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            And by the way, men don’t deserve punishment for sex because it’s their nature and prerogative, but women do.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 days ago

        there must be another simply-expressed term to reflect their thinking

        Monstrous. Sociopathic. Inhumane. Evil. Deranged.

        There’s plenty of simply-expressed terms to reflect their thinking.

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’ve always used anti-abortion. Pro-life just isn’t an accurate descriptor, and a “pro-life protest”, or a “pro-life bill” seem like undeserved euphemisms considering what they want. Outlawing executions would be a pro-life bill.

        Anti-choice is good too.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 days ago

        Not dying from a miscarriage at 20 doesn’t mean you have good genes, it means you’re lucky. Teen pregnancies (she had just turned 20) are more likely to have complications because their body isn’t finished developing yet.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 days ago

        The millions of years preceding modern medicine didn’t fix it, so I’m not sure how much time you eugenicists think evolution takes