Green politicians from across Europe on Friday called on U.S. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein to withdraw from the race for the White House and endorse Democrat Kamala Harris instead.

“We are clear that Kamala Harris is the only candidate who can block Donald Trump and his anti-democratic, authoritarian policies from the White House,” Green parties from countries including Germany, France, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Ireland, Estonia, Belgium, Spain, Poland and Ukraine said in a statement, which was shared with POLITICO ahead of publication

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    20 days ago

    Jill Stein is funded by Russia. Every multicellular organism knows this by now.

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yup, even my friend Fred the Fungi was just yapping about this, told me to follow the money.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      You’d be suprised. My partner is very tuned in to politics and watches Hasan near daily, reads news, talks with me and her friends but casually mentioned she would be voting for Stein instead of Harris. I very quickly pulled up the Putin dinner party pic and a handful of articles explaining the various connections. It all totally flabbergasted her and she decided on Harris despite her, very legitimate, reservations over genocide. Realistically we’re in a very blue state that will safely go Harris so it wouldn’t matter, but I’m certain other people will still fall into the same trap.

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      19 days ago

      I might be more tempted to believe this if I wasn’t regularly accused of the same thing by every Democrat on Lemmy.

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 days ago

        It holds a little more weight when you’ve been photographed at a formal dinner alongside every single Russian head of state.

        • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          But these accusations don’t even make sense.

          Why would Putin benefit from having a Russian plant as the presidential candidate of the Green Party? Does he mistakenly think the Green Party has some influence in American politics?

          And how could he known his plant would be selected by the party as their presidential candidate? Is he psychic? Is the entire Green Party comprised of Russian plants?

          If his goal was for the Greens to be a spoiler for the Dems, surely they’d be just as much of a spoiler no matter who their candidate was. In fact, without Stein, they could probably find a better candidate and be more of a spoiler.

          I’m not worried about Stein being a Russian plant because it literally would make no difference to anything.

          • skulblaka
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            Why would Putin benefit from having a Russian plant as the presidential candidate of the Green Party? Does he mistakenly think the Green Party has some influence in American politics?

            They aren’t intended to win, they’re intended to do exactly what they’re doing - selecting particular wedge issues to split the Democrat vote and give them a lower total percentage vs Republicans, the other main player. In this case the Green Party was originally set up to champion environmental issues, hence their name, but have also been a convenient shunt for the Israel/Palestine situation and Harris’ percieved refusal to budge on such.

            Everyone involved knows that a third party has no realistic chance of victory in the US, so setting up a third-party honeypot to gather passionate far-left voters away from the Democrat vote is a potent power move for the Republican party. Every percent point lost by the Democrats is one gained for the Republicans, even if the point doesn’t go to them. With margins as thin as they usually are, this is significant. Putin in particular cares about this because Trump is vocally friendly towards him and Democrats and their voters are not.

            And how could he known his plant would be selected by the party as their presidential candidate? Is he psychic? Is the entire Green Party comprised of Russian plants?

            I can’t find proof of this with a cursory web search, but it’s suspected that the entire Green Party is primarily funded via Russian interests. If nothing else it is known factually that Jill Stein has attended at least one private dinner with Russian heads of state and has appeared on Russian state media propaganda quite a lot. I doubt the entire party is a Russian op but significant portions of its leadership including candidate Stein are pretty clearly compromised.

            If his goal was for the Greens to be a spoiler for the Dems, surely they’d be just as much of a spoiler no matter who their candidate was. In fact, without Stein, they could probably find a better candidate and be more of a spoiler.

            Personally I feel that Stein may just be more who they got rather than who they wanted, and this may be where the plan is starting to fall apart. A truly passionate, honest far-left firecracker candidate probably would be an excellent spoiler, and pull many honest far-left votes, but they also wouldn’t be susceptible to foreign influence. They’re choosing to take the bird in the hand, rather than two in the bush, and Stein is who they’ve got that they can control.

            At the end of the day Putin has a very clear motive to help Trump win his election at all costs and the leadership of the Green Party has been shown to have been in close contact with Moscow. It may not matter materially whether or not she is a Russian plant at this time. But it does matter because it is yet another avenue for hostile foreign interference with our election.

            • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 days ago

              They aren’t intended to win, they’re intended to do exactly what they’re doing - selecting particular wedge issues to split the Democrat vote and give them a lower total percentage vs Republicans

              But surely that would happen even if someone else like Cornel West was the Greens leader.

              All Putin achieves by (somehow) installing his plant as the Greens presidential candidate is lowering the Greens’ vote share by preventing them from getting the most charismatic and effective candidate.

              If Putin really did subvert the Greens’ selection mechanism and install a less popular candidate with limited appeal, the Democrats should be thanking him.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        Nothing to believe. The proof is in front of your eyes. Green Party funding is from Russian sources. Jill loves to have dinners with Putin and the oligarchs.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Type fast! Before long you’ll have to ship out to the front lines with you NK allies. Planting sunflowers is harder work than typing nonsense from your desk.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Yarp, and still voted for her because harris is that bad and hasnt shifted at on key issues that actually relate to the role of president. Like supporting labor (kahn, no strike busting, etc) and follwing the law with respect to weapon sales/delivery.

      Focus your energy on getting harris to move, its a lot easier than getting people like me to move; we actually have moral values, harris doesnt. Though at this point its unlikely there are many hold outs waiting for her. Cast my ballot a week ago. Good luck in your efforts! Im rooting for you 🤷

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        At least you are not worried about all the extra people in the world that will get hurt by your reactionary stance leading to a trump presidency. If you can’t have your way, let the world burn… Gotcha.

        In this case you either vote against actual fascism or risk it taking over.

        • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          If you can’t have your way, let the world burn… Gotcha.

          That is literally the rationale for lots of people. I’ve heard it spoken verbatim, and heck, when I was young and stupid, I said it myself. It’ll hasten the collapse and move us more quickly toward a glorious new future!

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          trump isn’t winning my state; can’t do much more to help you there mate. I’m sorry harris is running such a shit campaign she’s struggling against fucking trump.

          but threats need to be backed up by action or they’re toothless, just look at how netanyahu has ignored biden.

      • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 days ago

        “My moral values allow me to vote against my best interests and the welfare of anyone who doesn’t align with the christofascist right. I have such a difficult time with concepts like “logical thinking” and “cause and effect” that I can rationalize such a terrible decision and even pretend that I’m the solution!”

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          against my best interest? my best interests are in trump not winning. which is assured in my state. its not necessarily harris winning. so my best interests are in assuring there is enough pressure on harris post election and part of that is making sure my critters know votes will be lost for them in the future for israel.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              Mmm yes people explaining their reasoning is so horrible. :) its almost like you cant justify shit and only have pithy lesser evil nonsense to justify your support for a shit candidate. 🤷

              First step to not having lesser evil candidates: dont support genocides. Wild i know. Maybe you should try it?

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      19 days ago

      any proof ? and are we to ignore the dnc has significant funding from aipac to enable them to murder kids with our tax money ?

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        GEnOcIdE!!! Whatabout!!!

        It will ve a nice place when you all leave by tuesday.

        Oh wait, maybe you’ll be back whining about voter fraud

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Its not what about to mention harris’ policy position on gaza its extremely relevant to Harris’ campaign in particular to the nonsense being spouted here.

          Only one person had to shift to be less of a shit human and that was harris and this issue would have disappeared immediately. Learn to properly focus your energy. To help you with this process let me give you a breakdown of choices you as an individual had:

          1. Which is easier changing the mind of a politician who has flipped on a number of issues? Or a million individuals in a country of 300?
          2. Which argument is easier to make? Support a genocide? Or dont support a genocide?
          3. You should vote? Or you should vote for my particular candidate?

          Notice how you’ve decided to pick the harder of literally every single option?

          Harris will flip on a dime on gaza if you stop wasting your breath defending her and switch your efforts to criticizing her. No one is asking you to vote for trump. Hell look through my history its always: ‘if you’re in deep blue voting 3rd party is a okay, if you’re purple harris is your best option, but not your only one’

          You dont need to be this worked up over harris if she loses to trump its her fault for running a terrible campaign using terrible policy positions. She had an entire year of warning over gaza and she chose to swing right on her policies, alienating a large swath of her base.

          • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            19 days ago

            This is such a backward comment I don’t know where to start. Tortured logic, the fact that voting 3rd party doesn’t send the specific message you’re looking to send, or perhaps that it’s all Harris’ fault that she lost while ignoring everything about outside election interference including Stein’s ties to Russia and conservatives all in one post. Bonus points for projecting that a large death of her base cares solely about Gaza and would be willing to suffer fascism instead.

            Can’t wait until these astroturfing accounts are retired after the election.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Never said it sent a specific message. It sends one message: you didnt get this vote. I sent the specific message weeks ago, daily for 3 weeks to harris, and my local critters. This post is to counteract the nonsense spread about voting for the lesser evil and to give people an option to opt out of supporting harris without endangering a trump win.

              The message here for you is: jill stein doesn’t matter. Learn to focus your efforts productively. Its easier to influence one person (harris) than it is a million (people like me).

              Please reread my post in particular the 3 decisions your making atm and realize how absolutely useless your efforts will be here. Atm all you’re doing is broadcasting to everyone your okay supporting a genocidal candidate.

              Again if Harris loses thats her fault. Not mine, not yours. She chose how her campaign is run, what messages are delivered, etc.

              Also please watch this interview. Thinking these accounts are all astroturfing is going to hurt you more than me if harris loses. My state already has legal protections for all the things people are trying to use to defend Harris’ monstrous policy positions. They’re not effective arguments to vote for harris in my deep blue state.

              • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 days ago

                “Take a look at this video, which should convince all of you that trying to convince individuals is a failing effort.”

                Do you even read what you post?

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                18 days ago

                The way these people salivate over Trump hurting people who vote for Stein, I think they’re all bloodthirsty enough to want genocide. But keeping fighting the good fight. Just know that if Harris wins, we’ll keep having to pressure her after the election just as if she was Trump, and probably without the help of the rest of these liberals as they go back to brunch and wanting to ignore politics.

                EDIT: I’m not voting for Stein myself but I see why people are, and I think their existence is overall good, because it keeps you all and the people in power from getting too comfortable with the fact that we’re doing a genocide.

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Oh I’m 100% aware I’ll have to keep pressuring her after the election. its annoying as fuck doing the leg work for these dweebs.

  • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    20 days ago

    Good. I was apart of the Green Party, I left when I learned they were planning of running a candidate this year, when internally, we were floating around the idea of NOT running a candidate.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      That’s interesting insider info. Was the reason for not fielding a candidate because of this particular issue (splitting the vote)?

      • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Can’t say exactly, it was just floated around, I’m guessing it was for that specific reason, but that was around the time I was thinking of leaving for other reasons, they are VERY unorganized as a party and it really, really bothered me. The way smaller Transhumanist Party seems more organized than the Green Party.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          50
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Probably because running a presidential candidate is a waste of money unless your intent is to split the vote.

          Start local, gain influence, work your way up.

          Edit - to those downvoting, the Green Party literally has zero representation, even at the State level. And you want to jump straight to POTUS. Riiight.

          Get one state senate seat. Get one House of Representatives seat. Get some kind of representation. Then you have a bargaining chip.

          • Omega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            19 days ago

            The threat of splitting the vote is a good reason to run, if you feel like your position isn’t being taken seriously enough AND that it’s important enough that everything else is worth losing.

            The problem is that the majority of the Democrats are on board with green initiatives. The only holdup on the $10T program before was Manchin. She has now pivoted RCV, or more specifically destroying the duopoly because they are the enemy for “reasons”.

            Also, she’s said that she wouldn’t pull out even if the Dems gave her what she wanted. So it doesn’t really work as a threat either.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              19 days ago

              Eh, threatening to split the vote might in theory get some campaign promises, but such promises are likely to evaporate when things get down to it.

              Meanwhile if you actually hold a persistent presence in the house or senate, particularly when it’s close, you got ongoing leverage. Hell, folks like AOC, MTG, Boebert have an absurd amount of national influence for being elected by merely a singular district.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 days ago

          Why would you assume I just believe them outright? I just said it was interesting and asked a follow up question to get more info.

            • Saurok@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              19 days ago

              Okay, then prove that something happened. I’m not the one implying she’s some sort of Russian asset with 0 evidence beyond a photo. That’s you.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                24
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                19 days ago

                I don’t have to prove anything happened. She was put at a dinner table with Putin in Moscow. Something that only happens if Putin finds you useful. He doesn’t sit at random tables and strike up conversations with whoever he finds.

                You put the rest together.

                • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Your evidence for Jill Stein being bribed by Putin in her sitting next to a German ambassador at a table, and Putin sitting down in a seat at the other side of the table?

                  The Democrat misinformation campaign is in full swing here.

                • Saurok@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  24
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  You made the assertion, so the onus is on you to prove it.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              19 days ago

              You don’t get put at a dinner table in Moscow with Putin unless Putin has a good reason for wanting you there.

              He doesn’t just sit down with random people and hope they have a good time.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  That’s basically what this person seems to be suggesting. Like she just happened to be sitting there and Putin and all of his closest people were like, “let’s go see who this lady is and what she’s up to!”

            • Saurok@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              19 days ago

              Well, sure. I’m not saying that Russians didn’t have a nefarious reason to invite her there. It’s entirely possible and maybe even likely that they did it because they saw a third party candidate as a useful tool to sow some sort of election discord in the US. But that claim would be entirely different than the claim that Jill Stein did it because she’s an asset or that this was her idea or purpose for being there. I’m disputing the latter, not the former, because her attending a gala for RT is not evidence of collusion and this was the implication being made. I can find all sorts of pictures online of Hillary Clinton and other politicians having dinners with Trump or Putin, but that doesn’t mean the photos are evidence that they were in collusion with either of them.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                I like how you are completely overlooking the fact that I never made any actual claim about her being a Russian asset.

                You kept bringing up the asset thing.

                This is what I wrote:

                The asset part was a complete invention of yours.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            19 days ago

            Of course she says nothing happened. It’s like a child getting caught with their hand in the cookie jar covered in crumbs, and they will insist they did nothing wrong. Never expect someone to be honest when it’s against their interests.

        • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          54
          ·
          19 days ago

          meanwhile in the same universe. the cheney are as big of criminals as putin.

          doesn’t bill clinton has photos with Epstein ? its not like she is hugging him like biden hugging netanyahu. maybe he was there to poison her ?

          anyway people voting for her including me will write aoc rather than voting harris if there was no third option allowed. enough is enough.

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            anyway people voting for her including me will write aoc rather than voting harris.

            Oh boy, you’ll really be sticking it to The Man with that. You’re truly an important visionary, and everyone is totally taking you seriously.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              What’s fun is that it’s literally impossible to write in AOC in Indiana because you have to declare yourself a write-in candidate here and she didn’t.

              I had four options- Harris, Trump, RFK Jr. or the Libertarian.

              And I keep asking people like this who I should have voted for and who other Hoosiers have voted for. The closest answer I’ve gotten from any of them was a sudden heel-turn to “vote for who you like, it doesn’t matter.”

          • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            as big of criminals as putin

            Hang on, let me just dig up their rap sheet on war crimes… oh, wait

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            19 days ago

            I forgot to ask you!

            These are the four options in Indiana. No write-ins because you have to declare yourself a write-in and no one did. Who should Hoosiers vote for?

            • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              18 days ago

              vote for the candidate that best fulfills your expectations as a president. i am against voting just for the lesser evil. there has to be a minimum requirement for whats acceptable else we are begging this corrupt system to shit on us as much as they want. here most of us are struggling to make ends meet and they are giving billions to murder poor people in other countries. and don’t stop there. boycott all brands involved in lobbying or supporting genocide, boycott any candidates taking superpac funding. boycott msm peddling bullshit while ignoring the real issues.

              • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                Unfortunately, USA doesn’t have ranked choice voting. So voting for someone who doesn’t have a chance of winning is basically the same as throwing away your vote.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                18 days ago

                Months and months of “don’t vote for Biden” and then “don’t vote for Harris” and then suddenly when the people like you who have been saying that are presented with the harsh reality that choices really are limited, are saying “vote for who you want.”

                Amazing.

                • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  vote for the candidate that best fulfills your expectations as a president. i am against voting just for the lesser evil.

                  what part of it you don’t get ?

                  harsh reality of what ? that we have to vote just blue unconditionally ? cool live in this delusion, but those fed up with dnc impostering are only going to become more determined with this current toxic campaign. the only thing other than “trump this stein that” we get from them is launching video games or snl shithousery.

                  so again vote for the candidate that worthy of presidency else we are only lowering the bar each election and soon will have someone worse than trump forced on us by dnc.

  • Aa!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Isn’t it too late for it to matter? At this point, she’s on the ballots that she’s on, isn’t she?

    Especially for states like Oregon that are primarily vote by mail. I already have my ballot, and Stein withdrawing won’t keep people from voting for her

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yes, her name is already on the ballots, like RFK Jr is still on the ballots in many states, but the hope is her supporters will listen to her endorsement. Just because a person’s name is on the ballot doesn’t force people to vote for that person. Some people have voted already, some will continue to vote for her out of protest, some will continue to vote for her because they didn’t hear she dropped out or didn’t care. But the hope is enough people will hear that she dropped out and endorsed Harris that their votes will come through for Harris.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        When I went to vote last week and saw RFK Jr.'s name was still on the Indiana ballot, I burst out laughing.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        You’re assuming we voted for jill because shes jill. Which is not the case for everyone. She got my vote because of Harris’ absolutely abysmal treatment of arabs and gaza, her lack of pro labor policies, etc etc etc.

        Jill dropping out would just meant the vote went to a different non-trump candidate or left blank.

        The only way harris would have gotten my vote was if she modified her position on gaza, or another key issues like ensuring kahn was kept.

        She declined to do so, so i declined to vote for her. 🤷 But harris will be fine my state is 20+ dem.

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 days ago

          That’ll teach her! Way to go - you really stuck it to that horrible excuse of a candidate.

          It’s not like she had better labor policies (or practices) than that other guy (or did she?)

          It’s not like that other guy was (allegedly) working with an (alleged) war criminal to rebuff US efforts to make a ceasefire deal (or was he?)

          And finally, it’s not like AIPAC can literally thumbs up or down damn near any politician in the US like Julius H. Fucking, Ceasar and an almost universal bloc of voters will carry out their direction. Oh, wait, they will.

          The thing that pisses me off is that yeah, maybe she’s fine in Cali or Hawaii or wherever. But there’s gonna be a fuck of a lot more death and misery in the world if fascists get control of the United States in the form of Donald Trump, and in those few states that matter (because of the fucked up electoral college) that attitude , which I perceive as smug self-righteousness, could be the deciding factor.

          That simple worldview, unburdened with the whole idea of “you can’t make change if you’re not elected” must really be comfortable.

          But you sure showed Harris.

          I’d love to expound on this thought, but I have a fussy infant daughter that needs attending. BTW, it would be really cool if she FUCKING DIDN’T have to grow up in some goddamned Handmaid’s Tale dystopia.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            I agree it would be great if your daughter didnt grow up in such a dystopia. So tell me have you been emailing your critters to let them know to reverse course on gaza? Worker rights, (ala khan, health care etc?). Did you vote for harris in the prinary (rhetorical question obv)?

            Gaza is such a low bar, ‘dont send weapons to a country genociding’ we even have laws already on the books for this. Harris wants to claim herself as law and order she can follow the fucking law.

            Now as i said i live in 20+ state. My vote is literally wasted on harris. The best outcome we can get w/ harris is an absolute squeeker of a win. If she loses she has no one to blame but herself shes been getting told for months to reverse course on gaza. Biden has been getting told for a year. Their refusal is whats caused this.

            Now ask yourself: would you vote for harris if she reversed course in gaza? If the answer is yes, then why havent you joined us in pressuring her? All it takes is a lie to pollsters, calls to your critters, and a willingness to reduce her win ratio in deep blue states. dont worry we’re not asking you to vote 3rd party in red/purple states. Vote harris in those places if you can, if you can’t no judgement its not your fault harris ran on these policies.

            Whats more important is that we get every possible vote out down ballot. harris is secondary concern. What matters more is the house/senate. A harris win is essentially useless if we cant pass legislation. While a harris loss control of those chambers will be incredibly critical.

            You want roe v wade codified, focus on local reps and congress critters, ballot measures. You’ll have more success.

            • Railing5132@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              I completely agree with your last two paragraphs. Regarding the rest, the other person that replied stated my thoughts in much more eloquent terms than I’m able at present.

              Edit: regarding the electoral and electorate math: I noticed you didn’t touch the “Trump working the Netenyahu to block a ceasefire” (which would obliviate the need for bombs), “you can’t govern if you can’t win”, and “AIPAC” topics, but also seem to think that all of this is Harris’ fault or she has control of this.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 days ago

                correct. Harris will win my state regardless of my vote, hence its perfectly fine to vote with my distaste for her policies on labor and genocide. harris’ problems lie in other states.

                As for trump and a ceasefire. I didn’t think I needed to; Unless harris literally does that one thing she has so far committed to not doing, enforcing US law on weapon shipments to countries committing war crimes, Netenyahu will continue to do what hes currently doing make any ceasefire agreement DOA making the two admins immaterially different in terms of outcomes.

            • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              Yeah so the message so far has been carte Blanche vote third party. None of the nuance you’re displaying here is evident in 99% of these 3rd party posts. They’re all “genocide BAD, vote 3rd party or you’re COMPLICIT!” so the message here isnt what you’re saying.

              Secondly, applying your logic regarding wasted effort because your state is solid blue, telling others to write their congresspeople on the issue is equally useless. Throwing the onus on them is shortsighted. The, “what have YOU done” argument doesn’t really hold water with anyone, particularly when many people reside in a solid red or blue state

              Finally, voting 3rd party sends “a” message after the election, not during, and no candidate ever looks back at the election results to ask Greenies why they didn’t vote for them. They do canvassing before and during, and quite frankly they have to walk a tightrope between courting lefties and every other single-issue voter. Imagine you’re running and you have Greenies yelling about genocide, women’s rights yelling about bodily autonomy, and LGBTQ folks yelling about equality and all three don’t give a flying fuck about the others. What would you do? Exactly what Harris is doing - courting the biggest blocs of voters.

              I’m not gonna touch on the general laziness of my compatriots, but when I went to early vote at my precinct there were a lot of people voting straight ticket, so I don’t think most people will dig through ballots to send that message. Frankly, Trump in power means nothing for down ballot votes because he still installs a fascist regime.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 days ago

                sounds like you think voting is a wasted effort in general. 🤷

                They’re all “genocide BAD, vote 3rd party or you’re COMPLICIT!” so the message here isnt what you’re saying.

                Genocide is bad, and we are complicit when we vote for harris currently. but thats because people are happy to vote for her mindlessly. not because the people trying to get her to shift are wrong.

                Finally, voting 3rd party sends “a” message after the election

                Oh I’ve been pestering my reps all year on gaza. and I continued to do so up through casting my ballot mid month in october. I’m just also able to happily follow through given the electoral makeup of my state.

                Imagine you’re running and you have Greenies yelling about genocide, women’s rights yelling about bodily autonomy, and LGBTQ folks yelling about equality and all three don’t give a flying fuck about the others. What would you do? Exactly what Harris is doing - courting the biggest blocs of voters.

                Well first off I’d recognize that most people are very happy not to support a genocide. and that maybe an administration with historically low approval isn’t a good model for success. zionists are not the majority of jews. many are perfectly happy if we withheld aid to israel based on our laws. if I was running Id happily point out israel is in violation of american laws and as soon as they begin complying and stop murdering innocents they’ll get their weapons back. So what we have here is a minority group (arabs) vs a minority of another minority group (zionists). in most states the loss of zionists wouldn’t tick the needle materially.

                LGBTQ+ are well justified and I’d support them; just as I’d support anyone seeking personal freedoms protections that dont infringe on others rights.

                Women are more than welcome to raise the banner over bodily autonomy as well they should. the government should have not be involved in decisions made between medical professionals and patients.

                I certainly wouldn’t tell citizens to sit down I’m speaking, remove them from my rallies for no reason. I’d simply recognize the fact they’re there for a reason and make time for them as part of the schedule as long as they’re not too disruptive the rest of the evening.

                You see, its fairly easy to differentiate oneself from harris’ behavior. I certainly would have given arab americans a voice at the DNC for example. they asked for one slot for christ sake. would have been a lot harder to nail harris to the wall if she wasn’t acting like a radical zionist on gaza.

                Frankly, Trump in power means nothing for down ballot votes because he still installs a fascist regime.

                it’d certainly be a problem, think maybe you can get harris to recognize her follies before its too late?

  • spyd3r
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    19 days ago

    European Greens must be dumb as fuck then, because the US Green party exists to:

    Get

    Republicans

    Elected

    Every

    November

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      79
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      and republicans exist the dnc can put a boogeyman every election so we will have to vote for these corrupt scammers. our political system is so broken that we either get lobbyists controlled genocidal hacks or a dumb racist genocider.

      its like asking to eat either dogpoop or vomited dogpoop

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        19 days ago

        Two sides of the same coin am I right!? Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.

        I grew up listening to Rush Limbaugh and other hate radio. There is no liberal comparison.

        They regularly called for the death of liberals amongst other horrible shit. The toxicity comparison is ridiculous when the other side is liberals saying they wish conservative voters were not misled.

        I get you don’t like the government. I don’t either, but this is not a god damned game of good cop bad cop.

        • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          37
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          They regularly called for the death of liberals amongst other horrible shit

          they are the same vocal minority as those on dnc side who have said if trumps wins then they want all muslims who didn’t vote for harris to be deported to gaza.

          they two parties may not be the same but they are both bad and corrupt enough that we need to start voting them out. after 2016 primaries i have no confidence in dnc to not rig the primaries against an actual liberal candidate again.

          there are easy things harris can still do to improve her chances but she is not even moral enough to disapprove genocide, progressive enough to disapprove fracking. she has failed upwards in the corrupt dnc as a token minority whose career has been of a smug prosecutor who has only looked down on minorities.

          but hey why not just run a propaganda campaign against jill stein who has been pro-climate since 1998.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Trump fomented anti-muslim sentiment and literally passed a travel ban against Muslim countries.

            The RNC completely rolled over for Trump in ways far worse than the DNC snubbing Berny.

            Harris is not pro-genocide no matter how many times you say it. You make it out like decades of gloves on diplomacy with Israel is suddenly her fault.

            Trump is open to letting Israel do whatever it wants and while in office stroked tensions between Israel and Palestine several times.

            To blow off the fact that she would be the first woman president and to trivialize her to a token representative speaks a lot about your mindset.

            If Jill Stein endorses Harris knowing she is the only remotely pro-climate candidate that could win then perhaps she isn’t the piece of shit everyone says she is. I won’t hold my breath waiting.

            One side is climate change denialists and the other isn’t. Two sides of the same coin right?

              • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                What an unwarranted insult to the noble equine!

                This Shadowfax is a cheap, flawed imitation. A dollar store replica. A sad, sad doppelganger.

              • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Because politicians can’t just put somone in jail. The judiciary is an independent branch.

                Also you seem to be a 29 minute old account who has like 15 comments on a single issue and nothing else. Which is always sketchy.

                The entite purpose of your account seems to be “Harris bad”

            • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              To blow off the fact that she would be the first woman president and to trivialize her to a token representative speaks a lot about your mindset

              let me detail out the “tokens” here. do know that i am of indian origin as well.

              • immigrant : her mother comes from a upper caste rich family, harris grandfather was a officer in imperial service while many indians were being killed and jailed during its independence struggles. an upper caste privilege in india was worse than white privilege in US at that time. her mother was able to come here as an entitlement. so when dnc uses her as a symbol for immigrant struggles it irks a lot of indian’s whose parents have to escape india because of corruption and casteism and had to work hard to get here and survive in early days.

              and then there is her advocating for border wall and getting tough on immigration so basically adopting trump policy from 2016.

              • as a non-white she doesn’t seem very empathetic to them : this is an article from 2020 in herrald when she was already chosen as vp over warren (a woman) because lobbyist and mega-rich donors told bidden not to. if not for that she would never even gotten to be a dnc candidate here in 2024. warren was 3rd in the primaries way ahead if harris. warren today would have won by a landslide today and she has already called out on the genocide.

              so yes she is a token candidate from establishment.

              i am not even going to address other points as i am not voting or supporting gop. if a vp and presidential nominee don’t not even have power of condemning mass killing of children with our money then what’s the point of voting for them. choosing lesser evils never works it only brings more evil as we saw in 2020.

              then there are stunts like this which confirms to me that she is just a lobbyists placeholder.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Sounds like a alabama, Georgia, texas issue. Easily handled by the people in those states. Just like it has been in every other state. Harris isnt even the solution for abortion nationally, she even admitted this; she wouldn’t do anything differently than biden. Congressional dems are.

              Learn to properly focus your energy.

              • Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 days ago

                Except, I’m reasonably happy with what Biden’s done in his term. Especially when one considers what a second Trump term would be.

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  agreed, its too bad harris is fumbling the ball on such minor issues too, like labor rights and genocide. 🤷 no one to blame but herself.

              • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                “why don’t those people just immediately and magically fix their problems?” -this guy

                I swear, some people should not be allowed to reproduce. Understand nothing, but the first to speak up and argue.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  All I said was that at the federal level abortion still is legal(which it is), and you just went on a tirade against me…

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  lol, says the person ignoring the literal mountains of evidence saying an abortion ballot measure will pass literally in any state. it literally passed in kansas. Now if you want such a bill elect congress critters that will pass it. harris is immaterial until that happens. for some reason I doubt trump would veto such a bill; not because he said it but because he doesn’t generally care about shit unless it impacts him personally. But given congress has avoided passing such a bill in the past color me doubtful it will now. what else will they run on if not abortion and not trump? looks at harris’ policies

                  frankly if abortion is your defining reason to vote for harris well shrug that makes you a single issue voter and I thought they were bad? but maybe I’m fairly indifferent since my state already has enshrined abortions as law and I can’t solve all the worlds issues. especially the ones that are easily resolved at the ballot box.

                  so again, trump is an abomination, and learn to focus your efforts. harris isn’t some magic solution to americas problems. I’ll be over here getting ranked choice in my state.

              • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                You sound like someone who would have questioned the need for ending segregation because it “Sounds like a [Spanish Word For Black] problem to me!”

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  mmmmmm; probably would have been shot in the war fighting against it more honestly. let me know when harris can single handedly pass abortion rights on her own that the discussion can go somewhere. as I said the fastest route to protecting access is via state legislatures. hence why what 8 states have it on the ballot this year? would I prefer it federally? sure. sadly for you all my reps already support such a position and I doubt trump would block it if the bill passed. but since such a bill won’t pass congress shrug.

                  Its not a compelling reason by itself to vote for harris; since you know… she can’t single handedly make it happen.

          • vaultdweller013
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            No its neutral federally which is to say it is neither legal or illegal.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              Anything that is not illegal is legal. Federally abortion is not illegal.

          • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            This is how unaware and/or uneducated some people are. It’s been over two years since federal protection was removed.

            And people like this are voting. Given licenses to drive. Reproducing. Totally oblivious.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              19 days ago

              What? It is federally legal, it is just some states have bans. Contrast that with something like weed where its federally illegal but some states say they won’t prosecute.

        • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          this excuse again ? talk to some women in real life ? they don’t want this cause insulted by even comparing it to butchering of all the women and children by our money ? what choice they had on getting aborted by idf ?

          did she got a choice ?

          or them https://truthout.org/articles/idf-shot-at-pregnant-civilian-outside-gaza-hospital-under-siege-staffer-says/ ?

          https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israeli-t-shirts-joke-about-killing-arabs/

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        19 days ago

        Checks watch: phew, only 4 days left before the “gEnOcIdErS” leave forever.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      80
      ·
      19 days ago

      Maybe if your candidate were more popular than a rapist felon you wouldn’t need to worry about the Greens.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    19 days ago

    That would be against the entire purpose of her campaign.

    Havent they pretty much admitted that shes running cause republicans have paid for her campaign, to try and split votes from democrats?

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    Sheesh, you’re a bit late, folks. Besides, Stein is in the race specifically for the purpose of helping Trump win, so she wouldn’t listen to them anyway.

    • pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      18 days ago

      I mean she has been running since 2012, are you saying that she has been a Trump plant this entire time?

      If you are voting for Jill Stein it probably means that you have a distain for both political parties and want a candidate that’s not anointed without a primary to vet them AND you don’t want a authoritarian figure that will speed up our failing infrastructure and decline as a nation.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    “Why do you think I’m running? Isn’t this like telling me not to drink water to prevent hydration?” - Jill Stein probably

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    European Greens have always hated the US party. This may seem like politically aligned people asking a fellow traveler to stop but it’s not.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      The US “Green Party” isn’t really a party or even a cohesive group of any sort. They don’t actually stand for anything other than “not the democrat”. Oh, sure they throw stuff onto a platform for the election to try to convince everyone they stand for something but mostly it’s a small fraction of former Democrats who come out of the woodwork every 4 years to obfuscate the presidential election with the net end result of taking a handful or votes that would have otherwise gone to a democratic candidate. After this election is over they will vanish again as though they were never there. This has been their modus operandi since their inception.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Eh, I would say that while there isn’t a huge amount of alignment between many of Europe’s Green parties, they all kinda hate each other for different reasons. The German and UK Greens have gone through a lot of shit over the years for their stances on Israel (way before the conflict), alongside Nuclear energy.

      It’s often been a long-running joke that the main barrier for the greens in power is themselves. They’d rather attack each other over issues that don’t affect the electorate than try to mount a realistic challenge to govern.