Hello, I’m looking for a new distro that aligns with my privacy preferences and offers a wide range of packages without requiring me to search for PPAs, similar to Manjaro. I’ve grown uneasy about Manjaro’s decision to collect unique data like MAC addresses and disk serial numbers by default, even if it’s for diagnostic purposes.

In light of this, I’d like to ask for your recommendations on a Linux distro that meets the following criteria:

  1. No opt-out telemetry: I’m looking for a distro that doesn’t collect any unique data by default.
  2. Access to a wide range of packages: I prefer a distro that offers a vast repository of packages, so I don’t have to search for PPAs or third-party repositories.
  3. User-friendly: I’m not a fan of complicated configurations or steep learning curves, so a distro with a user-friendly approach would be ideal.

I’m curious to hear any recommendations you might have. Thanks!

  • tomsh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think you are looking for a distribution with KDE and flatpak by default

    • Rogers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Came here to say the same. Such a great distro, and it’ll be an easy switch from manjaro.

      I’ve been running it with btrfs and it has been rock solid stability wise. If you go btrfs I recommend grub btrfs for easy boot time snapshots and btrfs-assistant in the aur if you want a GUI to manage btrfs maintenance.

  • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you’re already used to Arch-based systems, and enjoy the convenience of the AUR, what about EndeavourOS?

    It’s basically Arch with GUI install scripts, and a different wallpaper.

    • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I saw one commenter suggested Arch itself. IMO it’s even a better idea than EOS.

      archinstall doesn’t have GUI, but it has very nice TUI (like what you have when you use htop), and you could finish selecting the options in very few minutes.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Maybe I’m a dumbass and it’s my fault, but I find that archinstall always has an issue when you run it. It’s easier to install arch manually than run the and troubleshoot.

  • Blxter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I switched to EOS Endeavour OS. I don’t think it has data collection

      • Classy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Endeavour has been an amazing distro for me, noob Linuxer. I started on Ubuntu Cinnamon, then tried Mint, and ended here on Endeavour and I love it.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Use Arch Linux. There’s a script called “archinstall” you can use after connecting to the internet, and it’s basically a guided installer

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Trisquel is a fully ‘Free as in freedom’ distro.

    Zero telemetry now or in the future.

    Ubuntu based, so large FLOSS package repository.

    Mate UI, simple user friendly layout.

    * You will need hardware that works with fully free hardware drivers (for printer, WiFi, GPU etc). Drivers with binary-blobs are not included, due to potential security risks or spyware.

    Test your hardware with a bootable USB.

  • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    i found endeavor to be nicer than Manjaro but tbh I’m at the stage where i just recommend installing arch. it’s gotten a lot easier. endeavor is also arch based though so I’d go with that if you want super easy install / extra stuff installed ootb

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    openSUSE Tumbleweed has served me well for some time now. Maybe give it a look-see?

    • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Second this. Tumbleweed is a great distro. Nearly everything you’ll need can be found in default repos. Then there are several endorsed (semi) official add-on repos, and if that fails there’s always OBS (opi is your friend for searching those).

  • pastermil
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Debian or Linux Mint

    Arch would actually stand a chance.

    • interurbain1er
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t understand the concept. It’s Debian with xfce and a custom theme. Why is that a distribution. Seems like a meta package would be enough.

  • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I really like Pop!_OS, AFAIK it doesn’t have any telemetry. It’s basically a Ubuntu fork but without the stupid Ubuntu stuff, and they’re currently even working on their own Desktop Environment.