• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Am I the only one who found a message of “hope” in Idiocracy? We start at a future dystopia approaching human extinction caused by following some of the worst trends in current society. Then a savior appears, and they’re smart enough to actually follow him? They’re able to overcome some of their worst natures and start on the road to recovery.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I keep trying to tell people. We do not live in Idiocracy, Idiocracy is a fucking utopia compared to what our situation is

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      Yeah stupid people wishing they had real solutions is a way better outcome than stupid people cheering for the worst outcomes thinking they are solutions

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Nah the stupidest timeline is simulation 28 where Elon Musk was able to capture the FDA and 30% of the US population was left mentally disabled by malfunctioning brain implants. Compared to those guys you’re doing just fine simulation 19.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Here we are, “Idiocracy .001”, folks. We are at the point where they haven’t even realized that they need a person with an actual brain. It will get worse, much worse. Maybe they will pick a pedophile for attorney general. Oh, wait.

  • daikiki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Remember that time when we elected a literal idiot to be president and a million Americans died because of how fucking stupid he was?

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We were averaging one 9/11 every three days during Trump’s pandemic. And that’s just counting the deaths directly attributed to COVID, with the CDC and a shitload of states playing “don’t test, don’t tell” plus the delayed deaths due to cardiac injury I’m betting the death numbers were closer to 5x reported.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        Yeah but it’s not like we could bomb the virus so what are we gonna do? We’re Americans, after all, the only thing we can do is wage war. War on drugs, war on crime, war on poverty, war for independence, war to end slavery, war on Mexico, war on Spain.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I still don’t know why Kamela didn’t just run ads reminding people of all those who aren’t here because of Trump’s handling of Covid.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The democrats have all been Ned Stark in Kings Landing for a decade. Taking the high road doesn’t work against when the goal of the opposition is to slit your throat

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 minutes ago

            …Can you explain the character better for those of ous who don’t Game any thrones or Sing without fire and ice, thanks.

            • cmbabul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 minutes ago

              Spoilers I guess. Ned was an honorable man summoned to rule at advisor to the king in the capital. He plays the game of politics with honor and get his head cut off for it.

      • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s why this time the plan is to get rid of a health ministery before the next pandemic hits.

        • seaQueue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Can’t have high pandemic casualties if the pandemic is fake news and you’ve dismantled the agency responsible for coordinating testing!

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not So Fun fact:

      Bird flu has killed 50% of the humans it’s infected so far, and that same idiot is going to be back in charge.

      And this time, our soon to be Secretary of Health has part of his brain eaten away by a worm.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Hey let’s do it again! I’ll call 10 million of my fellow Democrats and tell them not to bother showing up to vote. It’ll be fun!!!

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And then we prosecuted him for crimes, convicted him, and then sentenced him to live in government housing for the next 4 years?

      Shhh, everything I said is true don’t ruin it for me with facts.

  • s08nlql9@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    stupidiest timeline

    i’m waiting for MTG’s nomination and we should be good to go

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      She probably won’t get one since she called out Laura Loomer for saying the quiet part out loud being too racist

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Wow, I wasn’t even paying attention to her. Looks like she and Lauren Bobblehead both kept their seats. I really think this election confirms that we’re in a simulation, and a drunk grad student just fucked with it.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well, as long as we fly out an antivaxxer in change of the only department that can ban existing vaccines, that should be fine.

      • Ton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, as long as you have the money to pay for it yourself, you’re golden. This could decimate the Republican voting base forever though.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Statistically for some of us it’s always been Idiocracy…

    It’s only takes two standard deviations above 100, before the difference between you and the average person, is the same as average person and someone with an intellectual disability.

    If you’re really unlucky you’re 3 standard deviations above and then like 80%+ of the population would be classified as having an intellectual disability if your IQ was the frame of reference instead of 100.

    And our own IQ is literally our own frame of reference…

    So yeah. At any given point in human history, roughly 2%, definitely 0.1% have been living in fucking Idiocracy, and nothing will ever make it better for them.

    Ignorance is bliss, because you never deal with someone that far below yourself, and you don’t notice the other person being that much higher.

    But 30 points is the line, because that’s where differences become apparent and one sided frustration common.

    • weker01
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      IQ is not linear enough for this argument to hold imho

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You think bell graph distribution should be linear?

        I’m genuinely curious what you’re trying to say here

        • weker01
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No I don’t think that of course.

          What I am saying is that the meaning of relative differences is non linear. That is 30 IQ points difference is not the same kind of difference from 70 to 100 points as from 100 to 130 nor from 150 to 180.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Nope.

            30 points is 30 points, and that’s the round number around the point where the difference is very apparent to the person 30+ above the other…

            If you’ve never experienced that before, most people never will. If you’re the one talking to someone that much higher than you, if you did notice you would just noticed you’re not understanding and you’d likely blame the person talking.

            Exactly like Idiocracy.

            Ignorance is bliss, because you never deal with someone that far below yourself, and you don’t notice the other person being that much higher.

            If you’re 100, only 2% are 30+ below you, and depending on your country you’ll never really run into them.

            But if you’re 145, it’s around 84% of the population, and the vast amount of people you interact with in public will give you that feeling.

            I understand you’re not getting this, but it doesn’t mean it’s something I just pulled out of my ass. You’re just not understanding it

            • weker01
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              I am getting what you are saying. It’s not difficult to understand but I understand that for you it must seem like I don’t get it.

              What I am stating though is that while you assume the relationship of IQ and that feeling you are describing to be linear it is in fact not.

              Like most relationships between metric and human feelings it’s highly non linear and individual to everyone. I disagree that someone with k+30 IQ feels the same about someone with k IQ no matter the reference IQ k.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I am getting what you are saying

                And then you go on to say you don’t get it…

                I disagree that someone with k+30 IQ feels the same about someone with k IQ no matter the reference IQ k.

                Have a nice life bub, it’ll be less frustrating than it is for some of us at least.

                • weker01
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Prime c/iamverysmart material. Thanks for the laugh.