“We’re all going to an evidentiary hearing and I’m going to figure out exactly what happened,” the judge, Christopher Lopez, said in an emergency hearing on Thursday afternoon. “No one should feel comfortable with the results of this auction.”

Oh bullshit.

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is this not the capitalist dystopia they wanted? It was an auction, The Onion was the highest bidder, and the discussion should stop there, right?

    • Kyuuketsuki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      “The Onion was the highest bidder[…]”

      Literally the point of the suit is that The Onion was not the highest bidder. From the article:

      The exact bid amount offered by the Onion for InfoWars remains unknown, but it has been reported it was lower than First United American’s bid of $3.5m.

      The victims of Jones decided it was better to get less money and not allow the brand to go to one of his allies to continue the usual operations. They are saying that even though they effectively own the brand, that they don’t have the right to choose who it’s sold to.

      There is only one way this should go, but…

      • _bcron_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The other bid wouldn’t be an arm’s-length transaction because that entity does business with Alex Jones

        • Corkyskog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          Auctions are contracts, most of them are beholden to the highest bidder. I am guessing thr lawyers are either being paid to make media waves, or they didn’t read the terms of the auction.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 minutes ago

            Sellers have a right to accept lower bids, or to accept non-monetary “value” and it happens literally every day in real estate.

            What I don’t know is whether the nature of the auction actually changes things.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Guardian’s slow on the news. This was known yesterday.

    There were only two bidders, the Onion and a backup bidder. The judge is looking into how the bidding process was run, because the Onion won with a lower bid than the back up bidder.

    The Onion’s offer was seen as a better deal because some of the related Sandy Hook families agreed to forgo a portion of the sale proceeds to help pay off Jones’s other creditors.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Both article explains that. They used a “credit” given by the Sandy Hooks survivors so that their money from this sale would go to Alex’s other debts first. So it was less money but allocated more beneficially for jones.