• the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Your claim doesn’t have anything to do with my original point other than semantic sports over whether the sun is a head. Philosophy and theology also don’t determine reality. We can only discover it through these means, the same way we can discover reality through science. The simple fact is that some philosophical, theological, and scientific hypotheses are closer to reality than others. The only way to dispute that would be to argue there is no objective truth, which is a self-defeating claim.

    Again, OP is making a meaningless argument.

    • agamemnonymous
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There is no objective truth. You wanting to project objective truth does not make it more real. Reality is a mystery, and using tools incorrectly to fool yourself into objective truth is a miscarriage of science.

      You’re trying to apply materialism to allegory. Evaluating religion this way is a meaningless argument.

      • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Is the statement that there is no objective truth objectively true? If so, there is some objective truth, and the statement is false. Like I said, it’s a self-defeating claim.