Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If this happens, I’d be interested in seeing how this effects ChromeOS. I don’t use it but my mom does.

    Also, if you’re confused as to why ChromeOS would be effected, while it’s based on Gentoo Linux, ChromeOS uses a modified version of Chrome as it’s Desktop Environment.

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Google will bribe trump and this’ll be undone immediately

    • 0xb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      31 minutes ago

      That would be the logical thing according to common sense and probably according to pichai a few weeks ago, but trump just nominated an anti big tech and musk friend to the FCC. musk is behind almost everybody in ai and autonomous cars so he’ll definitely push to hamper all competitors.

      Sure, we don’t know how far would they go or how long will musk keep having white house influence and I personally think breaking up google is now off the table, but I don’t think they will get off the hook too easily.

      So surely a very big bribe.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Google is such a good company, one the best. Everybody says it. I was just talking to John Google the other day, and he tells me, no really he did, he tells me we’re going to do amazing things together. Oogles of googles. That’s what we’ll sell. Everybody will know about google by this time next year. It’s true.

  • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Lit. It’s a good ask although it’s not clear what separation means here. Not going to hold my breath, the big corpos seem to usually win these kind of games.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s like they’re a company pretending to be another company, disguised as another company. Tropic Thunder all the way down.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Chrome is now owned by a company, owned by a company, owned by another company, that is owned by Google.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And even in the case where there is actual separation, and competition, it will only be temporary!

        see history of telco consolidation after a monopoly breakup in 1984

    • JokerOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They already have Servo.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What’s to stop them just making another browser?

      Nothing. Chromium is open source. So they could just fork it and declare a new “official” google browser and it would be a lot like Chrome.

      I’m not sure why the govt thinks forcing google to give up a particular fork/branch of an open source browser is all that meaningful. It might make more sense if Chrome was a closed source one of a kind browser.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s exactly what I was thinking. It also makes Chrome essentially worthless to anyone except Google.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They didn’t make the first one! They got it from Apple, who themselves got it from KDE.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not needed. Internet Explorer existed for years after the 90s. It wasn’t killed by the courts. It was killed by the fact that it’s only function was to install a better browser on first boot.

      • cdf12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think you are severely underestimating how many people don’t even understand the difference between windows, explorer, a web browser and even the Internet itself during the 90’s well into the 2000’s even 2010’s.

        That’s who kept IE alive

    • JokerOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It has a soft paywall.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It has a soft paywall.

        I think the common practice is to link to the original in the URL bar and then use the body text to do paywall/loginwall removals.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Then leave that to every one else to deal with; don’t make other people wear your tin-foil hat. Or just start your own community and call it “Dot’s Offbrand Extravaganza” or something.

        • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          Pretty sure this is more about access and performance than privacy. I never knew about this site before, but damn, a news article that only contains words on a page and loads quickly? I thought news websites were supposed to be hostile to users?

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is probably the real reason corporate America had no interest in endorsing Harris.