• bitflag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What you forget is the cost of opportunity: the money that is stuck in a house is money that would yield income if it was invested somewhere else. Long term stock markets typically return 7%+, while rental return (or the rent you save by buying) can be anywhere from 3 to 7% depending on market, minus maintenance and other holding costs.

        So there’s no fast and hard guarantee that owning or renting is best - you need to run a proper simulation with the right parametres taking everything into account. In markets with low rental returns, renting is typically optimal.

          • bitflag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Let me give you an overly simplified example. You are in a property market where rental yield is 3% (happens in some cities)

            You could put a million dollar into buying a house and save $30k in rent every year

            or

            You could rent a million dollar house for $30k, and invest your million dollar in the market at 7%, returning $70k per year

            Obviously this gets more complicated with mortgages, taxes, maintenance, interest rates, etc. but the gist of it is that owning your home always comes with an opportunity cost, every dollar of house equity is a dollar that isn’t invested somewhere else. Depending on circumstances, renting might be the most economical choice.

    • xmunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      What even is maintenance?