Have the patents for H.264 MPEG-4 AVC expired yet? - Meta
meta.wikimedia.org
  • kralk@lemm.eeEnglish
    3·
    5 hours ago

    I have literally no understanding of video codecs, standards etc. Is there a “set and forget” option which is free and good?

    • GHiLAEnglish
      11·
      5 hours ago

      H264 is almost universally playable and transcodable by nearly everything on earth.

        • d_k_bo@feddit.orgEnglish
          1·
          21 minutes ago

          That depends on where you live. In many parts of the world, software patents don’t exist and aren’t applied.

        • PieMePlenty@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          4 hours ago

          Commercial use requires payment to patent holders, free use does not (whenever end user does not pay to watch). I dont know how ad supported streams are categorized, probably commercial. For personal use, I wouldnt worry about the license. Worry when you start a streaming server and start making revenue.

        • GHiLAEnglish
          3·
          3 hours ago

          Never cared. I’m one of those people that would indeed download a car.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      3 hours ago

      Because patents cause issues for free software. Some examples:

      • As far as I can tell, vlc is legal only because French law does not recognize software patents, see here.
      • HDMI 2.1 support in AMDGPU is impossible, see here.
      • I think Media Foundation is unsupported in Proton because of patents as well, though I’m having trouble finding a reliable source on that.
    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
      19·
      6 hours ago

      And free and open source software can be written, shared and used without potentially getting sued. And these projects power lots of things.