Summary

Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was fatally shot in a premeditated attack outside the New York Hilton Midtown before speaking at an investor conference.

The gunman, still at large, fired multiple times, leaving shell casings marked with the words “deny,” “defend,” and “depose.”

Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive. His wife confirmed prior threats against him.

Analysts speculate a possible vendetta tied to his company. The case raises questions about executive security, as Thompson lacked personal protection despite known risks.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      No, it’s because they are immensely fearful of admitting the reason because they know a lot of other people would agree and it would potentially upset the status quo so much. And that would be bad for their masters.

      Especially if it turned out to be contagious.

      • atzanteol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        No it’s because we don’t know what his motive was.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s because they literally don’t know who killed him yet. You don’t have to come up with a silly conspiracy theory when the obvious answer is that they don’t know who killed him yet and they don’t know why he was killed yet.

        Someone who does bad things can be killed for other reasons. John Lennon was not assassinated for beating and otherwise abusing his wives and girlfriends. The guy who killed Jeffrey Dahmer in prison did it because he thought, but wasn’t sure, that Dahmer poked him in the back.

        • Grandwolf319
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          You say that as though the media doesn’t throw in their opinion constantly without being sure.

          Imo it’s better journalism to point out what everyone is thinking and point out it’s not confirmed yet.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            The media absolutely does that. And they should not. But a bunch of pundits speculating is apparently something people enjoy watching and reading, so they do it anyway.

            I’m not sure why you think just because the media does it, it’s a good thing.

            • Grandwolf319
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I’m not saying it’s a good thing, I’m saying it’s funny how they don’t do it now isn’t it?

                • Grandwolf319
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  No but imo there is value in pointing out the hypocrisy.

                  I don’t believe in being as civil as possible when your opponent is trying to be as uncivil as possible.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Okay, but this really has nothing to do with what I’m talking about, which is that it is silly to assume this is definitely retribution over UHC.