This is a genuine question.
I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.
P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.
And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.
Yes. I want the story of how United screwed them and their loves ones. I want thousands of families screwed by United to go as witness and tell their stories.
And hopefully the jury will find any evidence inconclusive.
The judge won’t allow that as evidence, I guarantee it.
If this goes to trial, and it probably will at one point provided he gets arrested, there is a decent chance of jury nullification.
Careful, this is .world
They are banning people for acknowledging jury nullification exists
There’s also jury nullification.
that’s not how our justice system tends to work unfortunately. if the shooter is caught, they will end up in prison, no doubt about it.
plus, from a purely socialogical standpoint, having a nameless person with an unknown story allows people to put whatever story they want on them, which makes them a way more compelling figure cause they can appeal to pretty much everyone