Hey!

I’m currently hitting the limits with Postman’s free tier and need your recommendations for alternatives. My company isn’t planning to upgrade to the paid version, so I’m specifically looking for:

Must-have features:

  • Unlimited API requests
  • Collection runner or similar batch testing capability
  • Data import from spreadsheets for test automation
  • The collection runner feature is crucial for my workflow: I heavily rely on being able to import Excel data to generate and map multiple API calls without manual setup.

Has anyone switched from Postman to something else that offers these capabilities? What’s your experience been like?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions! 🙏

    • dax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I am disappointed about their recent switch to a subscription model though. They quietly removed the single-time purchase “Golden Edition” and introduced multiple subscriptions. Not a good start, let’s see if the enshittification continues like with all API testing tools.

      • heavydust
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s hilarious. I remember Bruno being sold as the better tool because it had no subscription, and they switched to being evil in less than a year.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          I wonder why is this kind of product so liable to enshittification. It’s just a simple Electron GUI to edit and submit requests to a REST API. Much more complex software has worked fine for years as FOSS.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, Bruno is great! The only downside is that everytime I start it, I have that damn Disney song stuck in my head 😆

  • expr@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Curl. Everything you described is not hard to do via scripts. I use it every day for all of my API testing needs. You’re also not limited to the features Postman provides.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is like telling someone who needs a new table saw that they can use a handsaw.

      Like sure it works great, but it’s going to be a long process getting things done compared to something like postman.

      • runeko@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If a person needs to process an entire kitchen worth of lumber, then yes, tablesaw. If, however, a person needs to build one simple box and also learn how the wood fits together and practice their skills, then handsaw.

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        It does not take long to use curl, not sure what you’re talking about. There’s not particularly special about what Postman does.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Like what?

            I make backends, very complex, yet curl does it all, headers, files, any data, whatever.

            Need to test an API? Swagger will help everyone.

            You need reproducible tests? Write feature tests.

            Need to do many requests to achieve a business goal? Put it into a script. Shell is sufficient for basic needs, use anything that can be interpreted for anything more complex. Though at that point you should have an app to handle distributed states, which is never a fun time.

        • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s almost 30 years old. Not to knock cURL, it’s a staple for sure.

          HTTPie and xh claim to have a more intuitive UX. If the functionality is comparable, I choose tools written in memory-safe languages by default.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If being over 30 is “not modern”, OK, sure, but that’s a bit subjective.

            The fuctionality is hardly comparable, cURL supports many protocols. As for memory safety it’s trendy and modern but it hardly makes sense to rewrite such a project in a memory-safe language. It’s been tried though (for some components) and the project lead’s open to that.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      How would you test a GraphQL API with curl?

      EDIT: Nevermind I just looked it up and I’ll just stick with postman for now.

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The same way you test any other API. Not really different. I tend to keep my request bodies in separate files organized in folders to keep things tidy.

    • dallen@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also my go-to, I prefer everything in version control instead of someone else’s cloud.

      IIRC, Pycharm can also inject the same .rest files.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I use this as well. In fact, I have an instance of VSCode running only for access to the extension library - I do most of my editing in Android Studio, but manage Git interactions and things like Rest Client in VSCode.

      • snowe@programming.devM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        android studio is built on intellij, and as a result can do the exact same things intellij does, which includes the .http files (which I think are the same as .rest files). So you can get the exact same features in android studio as you do in vscode. I think.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    All I want is to make API requests with whatever headers but no fucking Electron so the app loads before the heat death of the universe… Please, please

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m genuinely wondering, if this is a situation where the open-source community just uses curl and that’s why there’s only corporate gunk for those who want more features. For example, curl obviously won’t support Excel import, but folks in the open-source community are also very unlikely to want that…

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’m genuinely wondering, if this is a situation where the open-source community just uses curl and that’s why there’s only corporate gunk for those who want more features.

          Yeah. Pretty much. As one of the folks who could code a new solution in go in a weekend, I have not - because curl plus some trivial one-liners in Bash, Python or PowerShell is already a 90% solution to what I need.

        • notabot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Depending on exactly what you mean by importing from excel, there are libraries for Perl/Python/your scripting language of choice that will simplify that so it becomes a matter of a fairly small amount of code to build a test harness that does exactly what you want.

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well, OP mentioned an Excel import, so I’m not 100% sure what that means either. 🙃

            But yeah, that’s part of why I’m wondering. I hardly know anything about Postman, so I’m probably underestimating how complex this would be, but it still feels like at least the core feature-set could easily be covered by an open-source tool, if anyone in the open-source community had that itch to scratch.
            Maybe it’s also just solving a problem that only companies have? The webpage mentions some things about centrally managing API definitions. Do not ask me why the API definitions are not in a repo. But I guess, if you join a company that works like that, you’re not going lean up against that…

  • Chris Jackson@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve been working on my own version of Rest API test client, it relies on self executing TOML files, that can be save into a git repository, it currently has unlimited API requests, will be under a 0BSD license.

    It currently does not do batch script or data import from spreadsheet or csv, but I can work that feature in, that should be easy to do in Python.

    It currently supports arguments and pipelining http responses into a http request. I suppose I could use the pipelining system to do the data import!

    It relies on adapters, those will take care of authentication like oAuth and provide the header to merge into the request.

    It will be broken down into edition to keep it easy to maintain, current working on JSON edition, but will do XML edition sometime in the future. I really want to stay close to the Unix philosophy!

    I did it out of frustration of Postman and other Electron based counterparts. But also I’m doing it because it fun 😁

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is my official recommendation. It aims to be a drop-in replacement of Postman. They don’t have pre/post-execution scripts at the collection level (only at the request level) and there are a few other features missing but they are making pretty good progress.

      I say official because I was on my company’s committee to switch to a new API tool. Though I personally felt that we should have just paid for Postman. But our business risk team didn’t like the terms that Postman had.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Hopscotch is the one I’ve been recommending, but it has a “use us before we also enshitify” vibe, so I’m going to check out Insomnium, the open fork of Insomnia.

    • atzanteol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I’ve given up on the gui tools at this point. It’s simple enough to just write small scripts.

  • brian@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can use insomnium for almost everything, but it’s not as complete as postman. randomly I’ll run into some problem that makes me go back.

    for instance, there’s no way to just enter binary data on a readable format to send over websocket. with postman there’s an obvious dropdown to send hex encoded data as a binary message.