• katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    no love for apple but what has meta done that was good let alone great in ever

    and why did he throw away mainstream appeal just so he could go on a losers talk show only nazis listen to?

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    M-series chip might be the biggest leap in newer time in computers. I think that’s pretty well made by Apple at least.

    What did Meta innovate? AI profiles?

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Says the guy that won’t allow Meta Quest developers the same level of access to their own hardware. Example: How would someone develop a 3rd party controller for the Quest VR headsets? You can’t. They haven’t exposed that API (or the cameras fully!).

    They don’t even let you set the clock on your Quest headset! Need to change timezones? Factory Reset

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just because meta sucks doesn’t let apple off the hook for anticompetitive behavior

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Zuck is fine with anticompetitive actions, he just thinks you need to InOvAtE to earn the right.

      • FolknForage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “Competition is for losers” lecture by Peter Thiel at Stanford lays out very clearly that none of these mfers actually wants competition once they dominate an industry.

        • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          everyone likes to point at 1984 and the dystopian future but I disagree. I’m of the opinion that the message of that story is more directed to the people who conformed and end up at the bottom of the food chain, locked in a hell of their own choices.

          The real inspiration for 1984 is Jack London’s The Iron Heel

          it’s so absolutely on point about our lives right now under capitalism and these ultra rich assholes.

          Published in 1908 and never more accurate about the world today than anything I have ever read.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Oooo who has more money to throw at chancellor trump to make sure their business becomes the Brawndo of the new age???

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean, he’s the wrong guy to call this out, and he and Meta are a cancer on society, but he’s still not wrong. It is bullshit. And it’s worth calling out in front of millions of people.

    • baggachipzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I thought it was a good read about the current state of technology, so I posted it in a technology community.

      Fuck me, right?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The current state of technology is some jerkwad yammering with another jagoff? No, that’s not the state of technology.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What’s really rich about Meta and Zuckerberg’s incessant complaining about being restricted by Apple’s rules for third party software on Apple’s platforms is that Meta doesn’t allow third parties any sort of access to their successful platforms.

    This is a bit of a false equivalency; “Apple’s” successful platform is a general-purpose computing device owned by the user while Meta’s are hosted services.

    These traditionally have different expectations, with game consoles being the exception. Occulus devices seem more like game consoles to me, while iPhones are closer to general-purpose computers with a few weird restrictions. I don’t like either, but I see game consoles as less problematic because their use case isn’t important.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you go by usage, I’d say the iPhone is primarily an entertainment device.

      Meta has been promoting their Quest 3 AR desktop mode for productivity.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        By time spent, the iPhone is probably used for media consumption more than anything else, but media consumption is not just entertainment.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Facebook/Insta/Whatsapp are important. Imagine if Gmail didn’t allow you to use other email clients, you had to use a google made app or the web interface. Would that be a write-off as “not important”?

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I did not say that they’re not important. I said that they’re hosted services, which traditionally don’t have the same expectation of user control as computers that users own.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Oh I thought it wasn’t that great ? Now it is an amazing general-purpose computing device owned by many.

      Huh.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If there is going be insistence on platforms being open there shouldn’t be these distinctions.

      All of these devices are capable of general purpose computing at a hardware level, phones, tablets, PCs, headsets are now very similar and generalised in that regard. I don’t see why a phone platform should be forced to be open while a games console gets to remain closed, when there is now only a hair’s breadth separating an Xbox from a Windows PC.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Jfc Christ jow many more months of fake news letting know that we got a new oligarch clan in in charge…

    Hey pedons say hi to the new boss, same as old boss, take your pants off.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        A guy who nearly always defends Apple’s controversial decisions. It’s probably not reasonable to treat him as neutral or fair in a dispute between Apple and any other entity.

        • baggachipzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oh no, a guy has an opinion! Get him!

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s fine that he has an opinion. It’s even fine that he’s a fanboy, but important for people evaluating what he says about Apple to know that he has a decades long record of being barely more neutral than the company’s PR department.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Uh… it’s a guy’s blog.

        That “guy” is among the best known die hard Apple fanboys.