Every single child in my third grade class is capable of debunking this ridiculous article. Are you telling me that there are adults who actually believe this?
Seems like it.
Casey believes that another key sign is that rationality is being washed away, because it’s seen as ‘too white’, along with science and logic.
Holy shit this guy is overtly racist. He’s claiming rationality, science, and logic for the whites. What a clown. Do you share this opinion, UniversalMonk? Do you think that only white people are reasonable?
Do you share this opinion, UniversalMonk? Do you think that only white people are reasonable?
No. Also, I’m not white.
But I DO think that wokeism is a shit thing.
I think racism is a shit thing, but you’re platforming it. “I’m not white” is no excuse. Do you think the antidote to wokeism is racism?
Racism is not an antidote to anything. It’s a poison that has no place in any movement, but calling every critique of wokeism “racism” is a cowardly way to dodge real debate.
How am I platforming it? I read an interesting article, and posted it.
Accusing someone of “platforming racism” because they challenge your ideology is not fighting for justice—it’s silencing dissent to protect your fragile narrative.
If you think anti-wokeism equals racism, then you’re not defending equality; you’re distorting it to avoid accountability for the flaws in your own ideology.
Thanks! :)
Ugh, I’m not calling the all critiques racist, I’m calling Casey and that specific quote as racist. Your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired.
Look, you’re not really good at this whole debate thing and it’s really boring when you can’t even get basics like that correct. You don’t test people’s ideas, just their patience. And that’s really embarrassing. I pity you.
Look, you’re not really good at this whole debate thing and it’s really boring when you can’t even get basics like that correct.
Thank you for that wonderful constructive criticism. I mean, as you know, I really want to impress you.
I pity you.
Thank you! See? I knew you really cared for me when you started with all that wonderful constructive criticism about an article I posted. That’s wonderful.
Thank you, friend! :)
These used to be Jews 80 years ago.
I don’t know what that means.
K
k
From the article:
Casey said: 'Free thought, which is actually unique to the West, that’s being washed away by cancel culture and political correctness and thought crimes.
‘Free thought is being washed away, followed by free speech.’
The irony is that the things that wokeness cancels and washes away are bigotry and intolerance that work against individualism and demand conformity.
Wokeness is the acceptance of people different from yourself. The anti-woke people want everyone to be white straight conservative Christian nationalists.
The assumption that everyone who is anti-woke wants a world of “white, straight, conservative Christian nationalists” is both simplistic and wrong. It reduces complex individuals with diverse reasons for opposing wokeness into a strawman caricature.
Many people who critique wokeness aren’t motivated by bigotry but by legitimate concerns about how the ideology is applied—often silencing dissent, prioritizing performative gestures over substantive action, and fostering division under the guise of unity.
Critics of wokeness often value free thought and open dialogue, which can clash with the rigid moral framework that wokeness sometimes demands. At its extremes, wokeness enforces ideological conformity, where failing to perfectly align with every nuance of its evolving rules risks ostracism or cancellation. This isn’t about rejecting equality or diversity; it’s about rejecting a new orthodoxy that can stifle genuine debate and alienate potential allies who disagree with its methods.
To claim that all anti-woke individuals share the same narrow ideology ignores the diversity within their ranks.
People from all walks of life—including liberals, moderates, and minorities—have voiced concerns about wokeness for its tendency to focus on symbolism rather than substance. Which is also why the presidential election went the way it did. It was just “white racist” people who voted for Trump. lol
Reducing every critique to hatred or intolerance not only shuts down meaningful conversation but ironically perpetuates the very intolerance wokeness claims to oppose. True progress requires grappling with these critiques honestly, not dismissing them with shallow generalizations.
The assumption that everyone who is anti-woke wants a world of “white, straight, conservative Christian nationalists” is both simplistic and wrong. It reduces complex individuals with diverse reasons for opposing wokeness into a strawman caricature.
So, exactly what you did to people supporting wokeness. Got it.
“I” didn’t do anything of the sort.
The reality is that there are plenty of people, on all political spectrums, doing this sort of thing. And it’s wrong, regardless of who is doing it.
Thanks!
You didn’t say that, but the article you posted and are defending sure did a lot.
I’m defending anything other than my right to post whatever I want, wherever I want.
You are not obligated at all to read it. You can, but no one is forcing you to. I saw an interesting article, so I posted it. Feel free to agree or disagree with it.
But I didn’t write it. You are also free to block me and/or the community if you are unhappy with the content I post.
And you are free to write to the news org which published the article and bring up your complaints with them.
Thanks, friend! :)
