• helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Sounds about right, From my understanding, they singled out TikTok instead of addressing the actual problem they claim to care about.

    [Edit, another comment says its any app with 1million users. So now there’s just going to be a hundred TikTok clones all under the same umbrella just different names.]

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      If they addressed the general problem it would also affect US social media platforms and they want to continue doing that when American companies do it.

    • AwesomeLowlander
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Due to the network effect, having a hundred apps instead of one is a big negative.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair, the law is broad enough that it could target these other services as well pretty easily.

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That seems like a bit of a stretch since it’s US based company. I guess some of its investors could be based in China though.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Russia is on the list too. But that’s the point. They can declare that an owner is compromised, no matter what citizenship they hold.