• Zak@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    In most situations, even that is giving too much power to the manufacturer. It’s fair for them to flash the original software as part of any diagnostic or service process, but not fair to refuse to repair or replace a product that actually has a hardware defect just because the owner put different software on it.

    • WhyJiffie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s fair for them to flash the original software as part of any diagnostic or service process

      only fair if it does not come with any data loss. so basically not actually fair

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Backups are, first and foremost, your responsibility. It’s unfortunately not realistic to expect someone to diagnose whether an issue is software-related or a hardware failure on any obscure DIY OS you might have installed. But as long as it’s possible to flash back the original firmware, warranty should still apply

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Software can easily harm the actual device, so locking it to prevent that from happening in a warranty situation doesn’t seem super off-base to me.

        • Zak@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          So can installing a faulty third-party cooling fan, but in the USA, the law requires the warranty provider to prove the fault was caused by improper maintenance or defects in third-party components.