• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    “No, the opposite. In fact, I’m going to be letting two officers from Washington police DC, I believe they’re from DC, but I just approved it,” Trump said. “They were arrested, put in jail for five years, because they went after an illegal, and I guess something happened where something went wrong and they arrested the two officers and put them in jail for going after a criminal. A rough criminal, by the way. And I’m actually releasing… no I’m the friend, I am the friend of police more than any president who’s ever been in this office.”

    Everyone is “an illegal” now if it’s politically convenient.

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess something happened where something went wrong

      WTF, he doesn’t even know the full details of these people and he just went ahead and pardoned them?

      What a clown.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is likely that the vast majority of what he is signing was someone else’s idea. Maybe he agrees with it, maybe he is just doing it because he was complimented when it was handed to him, but it is extremely unlikely that he initiated more than a few of the things he has signed.

    • ExhaleSmile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hylton-Brown is a US citizen, police say, and not in the country illegally as the president claims

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but also despite being born with a penis, and making no attempt to ever change my gender, I’m now legally a female. And so are you if you’re an American.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I thought that quote was you mocking him because if how much it sounds like a toddler…

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    He did it to win the police union back after pardoning January 6 criminals who threw bombs at police and hit them with metal bats.

  • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think it’s time Congress got off their ass and took away the power of presidential pardons. This is clearly not working as intended.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    They turned off their body cameras and mislead their supervisors about what happened.

    Is that the new standard then?

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is getting stupid … why the hell does the US allow pardons in the first place? … it’s now just used as a political tool to hand out pardons for propaganda and promotion.

    Justice and Law is slowly evaporating because it is all hinging on what ruler is power and whether or not they will pardon whoever is most convenient to pardon.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      why the hell does the US allow pardons in the first place?

      They thought only honorable men would run for president, and the people would only elect honorable men…

      🤦‍♂️

      (yes, the term “men” is intentional, because back then women were seen as property)

      • DerArzt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        back then women were seen as property

        Yeah I’m kind of thinking that opinion hasn’t changed for some based on recent events

        Goes to window

        Points at American legislation in the last several years

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Dammit…you stole the comment I was going to make, then went back in tkme, and made it an hour before I could…

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        A lot of loopholes now used were because they knew it was an imperfect start and assumed that when problems were found or new laws needed the Constitution would be changed. In some cases we’ve done that, in many we haven’t. I think one of the founders wanted to include mandatory revisions over a period, but again the general presumption was that we’d see the need and do it without being forced to.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thomas Jefferson, for his many faults, thought each generation should rewrite the constitution to reflect their views and keep it modern.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Many faults? The dude peace’d out to France, partied with the local nightlife, got drunk, got laid, and still found time to be a founding father.

            If everybody listened to him, the constitution would be rewritten, and we’d all be drunk and having sex at work.

            What’s the fault?

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It goes back to the royal prerogative of mercy, an English tradition. Because the forefather’s mostly made a parliamentary monarchy, but with some democratic ideas mixed in.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe a stupid question, but: How broad are the presidential pardon powers?
    Could he pre-emptively pardon anyone who will kill person X?
    Could he blanket-pardon all cops convicted of a crime while on duty?
    Could he pardon himself for all crimes past, present and future?

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Extremely broad, for federal crimes. None of your examples have been tested yet.

      Expect them to be.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Quite the optimism on how long it will take when the guy who bought a new department was throwing nazi salutes during the inauguration.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          He did.

          But the meaning of “preemptive” is more like a “Just in case”, rather than, “immune from future offences”.

          They were all pardoned from 2014 until now, but trump admin could theoretically invent a new case that allegedly happened on Jan 21 and make an investigstion out of it. (It probably wouldn’t go very far tho, I mean considering that even an indictment requires a majority of a grand jury to indict)

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      seems like preemptive ones and reflexive ones havent been tested but we are probably about to find out what happens when the prez, congress, and judiciary are all politically aligned and wanna do evil.

    • nwtreeoctopus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Others basically covered it, but just to be concise:

      Pardons only apply to federal crimes, not state laws/crimes. For federal crimes, they’re extremely broad.

      Pre-pardons are not a thing, but the president could pardon someone after the commission of the crime and before their arrest. So, almost.

      The president almost certainly can pardon themselves for any federal crimes but not preemptively. It could probably be a full on blanket pardon.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    and I guess something happened where something went wrong

    So smart. Knows all the details. A True Leader.