#Km91# to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 days agoContext Ruleimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down19
arrow-up181arrow-down1imageContext Rule#Km91# to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 days agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 days agolet’s invent a signal tankies (traditional sense) versus tankies (“i just want to use insults against people to the left of me” sense) 196 and i have literally always used the traditional sense.
minus-squarereallykindasorta@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoFor some reason I don’t think that will be catchy enough to spur adoption
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agodoesn’t need adoption just needs to exist for use when needed
minus-squarereallykindasorta@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoI have some thoughts on “private languages” that are probably not appropriate for this context
let’s invent a signal
tankies (traditional sense) versus tankies (“i just want to use insults against people to the left of me” sense)
196 and i have literally always used the traditional sense.
For some reason I don’t think that will be catchy enough to spur adoption
doesn’t need adoption just needs to exist for use when needed
I have some thoughts on “private languages” that are probably not appropriate for this context