Other social media sites have been doing it. Do we want to join in?

EDIT: Some people are saying that this is a power that ought to be left to communities… do we have a specific delineation of powers that relegates these decisions to communities? If not, then I recommend that these users propose such a delineation of powers. I would be very ok with this proposal failing because instead we got a more explicit set of checks and balances.

  • index
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As others have done the best solution seem to be blocking twitter links but still allowing screens, this way you preserve the content but don’t give them any clicks.

    • bestboyfriendintheworld
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This however will lead to easier spread of fake screenshots. These are common for Twitter, so checking the source easily is valuable for verification.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Which is why links should always be there. No matter how shit a site may be, a link to the original source for authenticity should always exist.