• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That seems totally fine. If he is upfront with clients that images are AI generated/uptouched, not real photos, and that is what they are paying for, that’s just called running a business that innovated a saturated market. He found a way to produce a product and do it cheaper than everyone else.

    Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing “real” memories? Personally I’d say yup. But that is my personal preference and not that of the clients.

    • Quacksalber
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      2 days ago

      Given that he does photos for 10 brides a day and still has free time, he must’ve been upfront about it.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t understand how because to make people look hot using ai you still need to make real pictures.

        So either they just expanded the business with a popular side project or he has customers send their own pictures (which are rarely in the format, proportions, light conditions you need)

        Most likely it never happened.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago
          • “Send a photo like this and I’ll AI it up”
          • Client sends a photo like the one anon asked
          • anon runs the photo on AI thingy, gets some results
          • anon shows the result to client

          I suspect the pics only need to have the person a similar enough pose to what they want, the AI generates the clothes and environment

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Personally I would be more disturbed if he offered and delivered real photos but never had showed up at the wedding (to my knowledge as the client).

    • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed.

      Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing “real” memories? Personally I’d say yup.

      And as long as other people feel the same way, regular photographers will still have clients.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      But pretty much all wedding photos are edited, so none of them are real photos.

      • taladar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plus they are so generic that 99% of people you show them to will have forgotten them a second after the photo leaves their field of vision.