qaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-213 hours agoTariffslemmy.worldimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1304arrow-down1imageTariffslemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-213 hours agomessage-square63fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 hours agoYou wouldn’t be protecting democracy. You would be destroying it completely.
minus-squarepiccololinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoNo it would not. It would be a wake up call for the senate to pull back the power of POTUS if anything.
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoYes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening. This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here
minus-squarepiccololinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·39 minutes agoMore like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
You wouldn’t be protecting democracy. You would be destroying it completely.
No it would not. It would be a wake up call for the senate to pull back the power of POTUS if anything.
Yes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening.
This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here
More like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.