qaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-215 hours agoTariffslemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1327arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1321arrow-down1imageTariffslemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-215 hours agomessage-square67fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·4 hours agoIf in 2020 Trump prevented Biden from running would you support that?
minus-squareliyunxiaolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoIf Biden was convicted of a high crime, absolutely. That’s only be constitutional.
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-21 hour agoSo if the courts who are the actual constitutional check said Biden could run you would support Trump stopping him?
minus-squareliyunxiaolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoThe courts aren’t the check in the case we’re talking about, the jury is.
If in 2020 Trump prevented Biden from running would you support that?
If Biden was convicted of a high crime, absolutely. That’s only be constitutional.
So if the courts who are the actual constitutional check said Biden could run you would support Trump stopping him?
The courts aren’t the check in the case we’re talking about, the jury is.