Friend has an old laptop with windows 10 that he doesn’t use because too slow and freezing all the time. Wants to revive it to leave at his lab in grad school for browsing the internet and editing stuff on google docs so he doesn’t have to carry his newer laptop everyday.

I suggested Linux but I myself always used Debian and I am not sure it will run decently with such low specs. Was thinking maybe Debian 11 with xfce or something? Any better options?

  • Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    Debian, lxqt and x11.

    If you can get an ssd in there then there’s some zram or something or other that can make it even better.

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Mint.

    It’s extremely stable Linux for your grandma, that comes with every tool that she will ever use and on the cinnamon interface all those tools are exactly where she will expect them to be if she is used to using Windows.

    I’ve gotten three boomers to use it and they hardly ever ask for tech support because it’s so stable.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Your biggest problem is the amount of RAM, not the cpu. Some Linux distros would fit nicely on 2gb with a few native apps open, but the moment you’d want to browse the web, all hell will break loose, as each tab will take hundreds of megs each (youtube takes between 600 and 1200 mb of ram). FYI, even if chrome/ium is hated in these parts, it uses less ram than firefox (there’s also a setting to use even less ram).

    I’d suggest you use either Alpine Linux with xfce (240 MB of RAM on a cold boot), or even better, Q4OS with the Trinity Desktop (fork of KDE), 350 MB of RAM. The advantage of Q4OS is that it’s a debian, so it can run lots of .deb files made for debian. Alpine is cool and all, but it has bugs on the desktop (some of its package management has dependency problems).

    A tip: to save ram, don’t use background images, only a single color. You can save up to 50 MB of RAM that way, depending on the image you’d be using.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      I agree the question here is not so much which distro but which browser.

      Todays low-end laptops often come with 8 GB of RAM. Even common phones have more than 2 GB of RAM.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Upgrade that box or repurpose it for something else. Web bloat has made 2gb machines useless for browsing and 4gb marginal, if the user needs Google docs, put in 8gb or more.

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I think antiX would be a nice option. I installed it on a 20 years old laptop and it runs quite fast.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    honestly the distro doesn’t matter so much as long as the hardware i supported. run a minimal desktop, disable CPU hogs and file indexing etc.

    I used fvwm on Debian for many years on old computers. worked great. now I have kde/plasma on arch. my 10 year old laptop handles it fine…

  • Kualk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fedora.

    It seems to be easy to manage and fast to install.

    SUSE is slow to run and self-update.

    Debian is far behind and Ubuntu seems to always have an issue during or right after installation.

  • lilith267@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Debian can be pretty light/small on a clean install and xfce should run fine on 2gb. Although the biggest thing is gonna be if the laptop has fast storage or not. Since its a celeron it might not be upgradeable, and if it doesnt already have an SSD any desktop will feel slow

    Personally if I really wanted to squeeze all the performance I could for web browsing I’d go with minimal Debian and RiverWM but thats a bit more involved

  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There are plenty of distros for very low end pcs, but they tend to require more tech skills to use. I have experience with a friend in a similar situation. I installed with mx linux for her and she is liking it. The performance is pretty reasonable and it comes with various tools that make it easier for people with less tech skills. The only extra thing I did was install the 32 bit version of firefox, because it makes a huge difference in low ram devices.