It’s not an overwhelming trend but I have noticed more AI/LLM content and comments on this sub compared to the old one (to be clear, most of it is suspected only and not significant enough to be provable). I have reported the most obvious and provable one so far which you can see here if interested.

No hate or negativity though ❤️ Thanks and respect to our mods; let’s just please keep our eyes open; part of what has always made this community beautiful is interacting with diverse people and their human voices!

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Understood. As a committed member of your community, I encourage you you to reevaluate your identification tools or process as it is clear to me that this is not true.

      • erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is the opinion of the mod team that a AI detection bot does not constitute evidence. also, I would like to repeat that we saw no other issues with the comment beyond the accusation that it is AI written.

        to make it clear to the community we’ve had exactly 2 reports of AI generated content. 1 post and 1 comment. Only one report from spujb.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thank you, Please let us know what constitutes evidence that you would act on. And of course there’s only one: I ONLY report the ones I myself am able to prove and never ones I simply suspect but are too short or benign to matter. :)

          My goal here is

          1. let people know there is a rule (it’s okay if people maybe didn’t realize)
          2. encourage updating of your review process as it clearly has let LLM content through at least once